Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33629114›Full record

Trial reportJournal of the National Cancer Institute2021

Patient-Reported Outcomes and Long-Term Nonadherence to Aromatase Inhibitors.

Dawn L Hershman, Alfred I Neugut, Anna Moseley, Kathryn B Arnold, Julie R Gralow, N Lynn Henry, Grace Clarke Hillyer, Scott D Ramsey, Joseph M Unger

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Adherence to Oral Hormonal Treatment among Breast Cancer Patients in Egypt.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dawn L HershmanDepartments of Medicine and Epidemiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8807-153X
Alfred I NeugutDepartments of Medicine and Epidemiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Anna MoseleySWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7514-7360
Kathryn B ArnoldSWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Julie R GralowSeattle Cancer Care Alliance/University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3837-9928
N Lynn HenryUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.ORCID 0000-0002-4771-5930
Grace Clarke HillyerDepartments of Medicine and Epidemiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0467-075X
Scott D RamseyFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Joseph M UngerSWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5191-0317

Funding

SWOG Foreign AccrualsU10CA037429 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI BLANKE, CHARLES D., MEYSKENS, FRANK L. · 1985 to 2014
$205.2M
SWOG NCORP Research BaseUG1CA189974 · NCI · THE HOPE FOUNDATION · PI CHARLES D. BLANKE, DAWN HERSHMAN · 2014 to 2026
$80.6M
UM LAPs -UG1 GrantUG1CA233160 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ANNE F SCHOTT · 2019 to 2026
$5.4M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA037429NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189974NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNonadherence to aromatase inhibitors (AIs) is common and increases risk of breast cancer (BC) recurrence. We analyzed factors associated with nonadherence among patients enrolled in S1105, a randomized trial of text messaging.

methodsAt enrollment, patients were required to have been on an adjuvant AI for at least 30 days and were asked about financial, medication, and demographic factors. They completed patient-reported outcomes (PROs) representing pain (Brief Pain Inventory), endocrine symptoms (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Endocrine Symptoms), and beliefs about medications (Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicine; Brief Medication Questionnaire). Our primary endpoint was AI nonadherence at 36 months, defined as urine AI metabolite assay of less than 10 ng/mL or no submitted specimen. We evaluated the association between individual baseline characteristics and nonadherence with logistic regression. A composite risk score reflecting the number of statistically significant baseline characteristics was examined.

resultsWe analyzed data from 702 patients; median age was 60.9 years. Overall, 35.9% patients were nonadherent at 36 months. Younger patients (younger than age 65 years) were more nonadherent (38.8% vs 28.6%, odds ratio [OR] = 1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05 to 2.16; P = .02). Fourteen baseline PRO scales were each statistically significantly associated with nonadherence. In a composite risk model categorized into quartile levels, each increase in risk level was associated with a 46.5% increase in the odds of nonadherence (OR = 1.47, 95% CI =1.26 to 1.70; P < .001). The highest-risk patients were more than 3 times more likely to be nonadherent than the lowest-risk patients (OR = 3.14, 95% CI = 1.97 to 5.02; P < .001).

conclusionsThe presence of multiple baseline PRO-specified risk factors was statistically significantly associated with AI nonadherence. The use of these assessments can help identify patients for targeted interventions to improve adherence.

Indexed as

Aromatase InhibitorsBreast NeoplasmsAgedFemaleHumansMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAromatase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID33629114
PMCPMC8328987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.