Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33629109›Full record

Trial reportRheumatology (Oxford, England)2021

'It is good to have a target in mind': qualitative views of patients and parents informing a treat to target clinical trial in juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus.

Eve M D Smith, Sarah L Gorst, Eslam Al-Abadi, Daniel P Hawley, Valentina Leone, Clarissa Pilkington, Athimalaipet V Ramanan, Satyapal Rangaraj, Arani Sridhar, Michael W Beresford and 1 more

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Eve M D SmithInstitute of Life Course and Medical Science, University of Liverpool.
Sarah L GorstDepartment of Health Data Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool.
Eslam Al-AbadiDepartment of Rheumatology, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham.
Daniel P HawleyDepartment of Paediatric Rheumatology, Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield.
Valentina LeoneDepartment of Paediatric Rheumatology, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds.
Clarissa PilkingtonDepartment of Paediatric Rheumatology, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London.
Athimalaipet V RamananBristol Royal Hospital for Children & Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol.
Satyapal RangarajDepartment of Paediatric Rheumatology, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham.
Arani SridharLeicester Children's Hospital, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester.
Michael W BeresfordInstitute of Life Course and Medical Science, University of Liverpool.ORCID 0000-0002-5400-9911
Bridget YoungInstitute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

PROCESSES IN PRIMARY FIBROMYALGIAP60AR020621 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI ROTHFIELD, NAOMI F. · 1986 to 1997
–
Clinical Seed Corn Competitive FundFaculty of Health and Life SciencesUniversity of Liverpool JXR10500 and JXR12309Versus Arthritis ARUK-20621Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust Institutional Strategic Support Fund 204822/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe sought to explore patient and parental views on treatment targets, outcome measures and study designs being considered for a future JSLE treat-to-target (T2T) study.

methodsWe conducted topic-guided, semistructured interviews with JSLE patients and parents and analysed the audio recorded interviews using thematic approaches.

resultsPatients and parents differed regarding symptoms they felt would be tolerable, representing 'low disease activity'. Patients often classed symptoms that they had previously experienced, were 'invisible' or had minimal disruption on their life as signs of low disease activity. Parents were more accepting of visible signs but were concerned about potential organ involvement and symptom severity. Overall, patients and parents preferred that children were entirely asymptomatic, with no ongoing treatment side effects. They regarded fatigue as particularly challenging, requiring proper monitoring using a fatigue patient-reported outcome measure. Most families felt that reducing corticosteroids would also be a good treatment target. Overall, families liked the concept of T2T, commenting that it could help to improve disease control, help structure treatment and improve communication with clinicians and treatment compliance. They were concerned that T2T might increase the frequency of hospital visits, thus impacting upon schooling, parental employment and finances. Families made suggestions on how to modify the future trial design to mitigate such effects.

conclusionThis study provides guidance from patients and parents on T2T targets and study designs. Complementary quantitative studies assessing the achievability and impact of different targets (e.g. lupus low disease activity state or remission) are now warranted to inform an international consensus process to develop treatment targets.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdolescentChildFemaleHumansLupus Erythematosus, SystemicMaleParentsPatient ComplianceSurveys and Questionnairesjuvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosuspatient perspectivesqualitativetreat to target

Identifiers

PMID33629109
PMCPMC8645274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.