ArticleProceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference2020
Clinical Documentation as End-User Programming.
Article in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using event logs to observe interactions with electronic health records: an updated scoping review shows increasing use of vendor-derived measures.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Article
- Digital Scarlet Letters: Sexually Transmitted Infections in the Electronic Medical Record.Sexually transmitted diseases · 2022Article
- Frequent but fragmented: use of note templates to document outpatient visits at an academic health center.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021Article
- Length and Redundancy of Outpatient Progress Notes Across a Decade at an Academic Medical Center.JAMA network open · 2021Article
- Comparing Scribed and Non-scribed Outpatient Progress Notes.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As healthcare providers have transitioned from paper to electronic health records they have gained access to increasingly sophisticated documentation aids such as custom note templates. However, little is known about how providers use these aids. To address this gap, we examine how 48 ophthalmologists and their staff create and use
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.