ArticlePopulation medicine2020
Sex differences in associations between receiving and sharing tobacco-related information and tobacco product use among Appalachian Youth.
Article in Population medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionGiven that Appalachian youth tobacco use rates are higher than the US national average, it is important to understand whether sex differences shape associations between receiving and sharing product information and using tobacco.
methodsMiddle and high school students in rural Appalachia (n=1038) were surveyed about tobacco-related perceptions and behaviors, including ways youth receive and share conventional tobacco-related and e-cigarette-related information. Youth were characterized as tobacco users (i.e. ever or current users of cigarettes, smokeless tobacco, or e-cigarettes) or never users. Descriptive characteristics were compared by tobacco use and sex. Adjusted logistic regression models evaluated associations between communication channels and tobacco use. Models were stratified by sex to examine effect modification.
resultsApproximately one-third of Appalachian youth (33.8%) were tobacco users and use varied by sex (males: 54.4%; females: 45.6%). Male (OR=1.75; 95% CI: 1.18-2.60) and female (OR=2.30; 95% CI: 1.53-3.47) youth who received e-cigarette-related information through friends and family (FF) had higher odds of tobacco use. Additionally, females who received e-cigarette-related information through public displays and digital media had nearly two-fold increased odds of tobacco use. Although sharing conventional tobacco-related and e-cigarette-related information through FF was associated with increased odds of tobacco use among both sexes, these relationships were stronger among females.
conclusionsAlthough specific communication channels were associated with tobacco use, associations involving receiving and sharing e-cigarette information were more pronounced in female tobacco users. Consideration of sex differences in how youth receive and share tobacco-related information may benefit tobacco prevention interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.