ArticleCurrent medical mycology2020
Isolation of
Article in Current medical mycology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Synthesis, molecular docking and biological activity assessment of novel 1,3,4-oxadiazole derivatives as broad-spectrum antifungal candidates.RSC advances · 2026Article
- An update on clinically relevant, rare, and emergingClinical microbiology reviews · 2025Review
- Reported prevalence and comparison of diagnostic approaches for Candida africana: a systematic review with meta-analysis.Diagnostic and prognostic research · 2024Review
- Biliary co-infection by multidrug-resistantMedical mycology case reports · 2024Article
- Emerging Antifungal Resistance in Fungal Pathogens.Current clinical microbiology reports · 2024Review
- What IsMicroorganisms · 2022Review
- OralCurrent medical mycology · 2022Article
- Anti-biofilm properties of eucalyptol in combination with antifungals against Candida albicans isolates in patients with hematological malignancy.Archives of microbiology · 2022Article
- Article
- Differentiation ofCurrent medical mycology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeOropharyngeal candidiasis (OPC) is a fungal infection of the oral cavity caused by the members of CASE REPORT: This report described two cases diagnosed with oral candidiasis during the receipt of treatment for malignancies. Conventional and molecular tests were performed on the samples collected from the patients' oral cavities. The test results revealed
conclusionAs the findings indicated, the achievement of knowledge regarding NONE: non.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.