ArticleCureus2021
Inter-Observer and Intra-Observer Reliability of 2D Radiograph-Based Valgus Cut Angle Measurement in Preoperative Planning for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhancing Precision and Efficiency in Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparative Analysis of Computer-Assisted Measurements with a Novel Software Tool versus Manual Measurements for Lower Leg Geometry.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Preoperative planning is imperative for a successful total knee replacement. Determining the valgus angle for the distal femoral cut from the preoperative 2D radiograph is a very inexpensive method that can be used to achieve the native knee alignment during a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Objective The aim of this study was to document the intra-observer and inter-observer reliability of the valgus angle determination for distal femur cut from a preoperative digital radiograph in a TKA. Methods A total of 20 patients with bilateral grade 3-4 primary osteoarthritis were assessed independently by a medical student, five surgeons, of which one was a consultant with more than 20 years of experience, and four residents in varied levels of training. Full-length (pelvis to toes) weight-bearing radiographs of both lower limbs were obtained prior to the surgery. The measurements were made thrice at more than 24 hours interval without any possible knowledge of their own previous measurement or that of other surgeons. We assessed the angle between the mechanical and anatomical axis of both femurs. Results The single measures intraclass correlation was found to be 0.733, showing that there is a moderate reliability among the six raters when single measures were considered, whereas the average measures intraclass correlation was found to be 0.943, showing that there is an excellent reliability among the six raters when average measures were considered. For intra-observer reliability, the single measures intraclass correlation showed that there is a good-to-excellent reliability between the three trials when single measures was considered. The averages measures intraclass correlation showed that there is an excellent reliability between the three trials when average measures was considered. Conclusion A very inexpensive method of determining valgus angle for distal femur cut was found to have a moderate-to-excellent inter-observer reliability and a good-to-excellent intra-observer reliability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.