Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33628593›Full record

ArticleCancer biology & medicine2021

Patient-derived non-small cell lung cancer xenograft mirrors complex tumor heterogeneity.

Xuanming Chen, Cheng Shen, Zhe Wei, Rui Zhang, Yongsheng Wang, Lili Jiang, Ke Chen, Shuang Qiu, Yuanli Zhang, Ting Zhang and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer biology & medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Personalizing non-small cell lung cancer treatment through patient-derived xenograft models: preclinical and clinical factors for consideration.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xuanming ChenNational Chengdu Center for Safety Evaluation of Drugs and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610000, China.
Cheng ShenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610000, China.
Zhe WeiSichuan Kangcheng Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Chengdu 610000, China.
Rui ZhangSichuan Kangcheng Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Chengdu 610000, China.
Yongsheng WangGCP Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610000, China.
Lili JiangDepartment of Pathology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610000, China.
Ke ChenSichuan Kangcheng Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Chengdu 610000, China.
Shuang QiuSichuan Kangcheng Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Chengdu 610000, China.
Yuanli ZhangSichuan Kangcheng Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Chengdu 610000, China.
Ting ZhangSichuan Kangcheng Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Chengdu 610000, China.
Bin ChenCenter for Infectious Diseases, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610000, China.
Yanjun XuSichuan Kangcheng Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Chengdu 610000, China.
Qiyi FengNational Chengdu Center for Safety Evaluation of Drugs and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610000, China.
Jinxing HuangNational Chengdu Center for Safety Evaluation of Drugs and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610000, China.
Zhihui ZhongSichuan Kangcheng Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Chengdu 610000, China.
Hongxia LiNational Chengdu Center for Safety Evaluation of Drugs and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610000, China.
Guowei CheDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610000, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4079-2455
Kai XiaoNational Chengdu Center for Safety Evaluation of Drugs and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610000, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9557-4899
Kangmei Pharmaceutical (China) · CNSichuan University · CNWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models have shown great promise in preclinical and translational applications, but their consistency with primary tumors in phenotypic, genetic, and pharmacodynamic heterogeneity has not been well-studied. This study aimed to establish a PDX repository for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to further elucidate whether it could preserve the heterogeneity within and between tumors in patients. Methods: A total of 75 surgically resected NSCLC specimens were implanted into immunodeficient NOD/SCID mice. Based on the successful establishment of the NSCLC PDX model, we compared the expressions of vimentin, Ki67, EGFR, and PD-L1 proteins between cancer tissues and PDX models using hematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistochemical staining. In addition, we detected whole gene expression profiling between primary tumors and PDX generations. We also performed whole exome sequencing (WES) analysis in 17 first generation xenografts to further assess whether PDXs retained the patient heterogeneities. Finally, paclitaxel, cisplatin, doxorubicin, atezolizumab, afatininb, and AZD4547 were used to evaluate the responses of PDX models to the standard-of-care agents. Results: A large collection of serially transplantable PDX models for NSCLC were successfully developed. The histology and pathological immunohistochemistry of PDX xenografts were consistent with the patients' tumor samples. WES and RNA-seq further confirmed that PDX accurately replicated the molecular heterogeneities of primary tumors. Similar to clinical patients, PDX models responded differentially to the standard-of-care treatment, including chemo-, targeted- and immuno-therapeutics. Conclusions: Our established PDX models of NSCLC faithfully reproduced the molecular, histopathological, and therapeutic characteristics, as well as the corresponding tumor heterogeneities, which provides a clinically relevant platform for drug screening, biomarker discovery, and translational research.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiceMice, Inbred NODMice, SCIDXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAntineoplastic Agentsnon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)Patient-derived xenograft (PDX)tumor heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID33628593
PMCPMC7877179
OpenAlexW3126903502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.