Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33628525›Full record

ArticleCase reports in dentistry2021

Analysis of Digital Workflow in Implantology.

Gustavo Vargas da Silva Salomão, Eliseo Pablo Chun, Renato Dos Santos Panegaci, Fernando Toledo Santos

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Case reports in dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05011604 (Full-Digital Workflow in Single-Tooth Implant Rehabilitation), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05011604 nacompletednot on this map

Full-Digital Workflow in Single-Tooth Implant Rehabilitation

TypeinterventionalSponsorFrancesco GianfredaRan2017 to 2021Enrolled19ConditionsFull Digital Workflow, Edentulous Jaw, Implant Site ReactionArmsFull-Digital Workflow in Single-Tooth Implant Rehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Impact of scanning errors on the trueness of digital implant impressions.International journal of implant dentistry · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evaluation of virtual handles for dental implant manipulation in virtual reality implant planning procedure.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gustavo Vargas da Silva SalomãoDepartment of Oral Rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Ibirapuera University (Unib), Av. Interlagos, 1329, Chácara Flora, São Paulo, SP 04661-100, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7884-1182
Eliseo Pablo ChunDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Ibirapuera University (Unib), Av. Interlagos, 1329, Chácara Flora, São Paulo, SP 04661-100, Brazil.
Renato Dos Santos PanegaciDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Ibirapuera University (Unib), Av. Interlagos, 1329, Chácara Flora, São Paulo, SP 04661-100, Brazil.
Fernando Toledo SantosDepartment of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Ibirapuera University (Unib), Av. Interlagos, 1329, Chácara Flora, São Paulo, SP 04661-100, Brazil.
Universidade Ibirapuera · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital workflow is increasingly accessible in daily dental practice. It has several benefits in implantology, such as the possibility of precise planning, which results in faster and safer surgery and, consequently, reduced prosthetic complications. There are also disadvantages that must be taken into consideration for successful treatment, such as deviations between the planned and placed implant position and intraoral scanning inaccuracies. We report a clinical case in implantology in which digital workflow was used throughout the process, pointing out its facilities and complications in the daily practice of dental surgeons. The patient had grade II mobility and external root resorption of tooth 11. After virtual planning, a surgical guide was fabricated by a CAD/CAM system, with immediate placement of a dental implant using the guided surgery technique. At the end of the osseointegration period, intraoral scanning was performed for fabrication of the final prosthesis also by a CAD/CAM system. After placement, the patient approved the aesthetic and functional results of the implant. We observed advantages such as simplification of clinical steps and safety of the proposed planning, but there were also disadvantages such as the complexity of digital tools, deviations of the placed implant, and inaccuracy in color selection. It was concluded that digital workflow is a reality that can be integrated into daily dental practice, resulting in greater safety, predictability of results, and ease of use in all clinical stages. However, it should be noted that there are still inaccuracies in digital tools and that a steep learning curve is needed in this area, which, if neglected, may lead to unsatisfactory results.

Identifiers

PMID33628525
PMCPMC7899756
OpenAlexW3130832600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.