ArticleCase reports in dentistry2021
Analysis of Digital Workflow in Implantology.
Article in Case reports in dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05011604 (Full-Digital Workflow in Single-Tooth Implant Rehabilitation), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Full-Digital Workflow in Single-Tooth Implant Rehabilitation
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Design and development of a virtual reality simulation for dental implant prosthesis training.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Article
- Impact of scanning errors on the trueness of digital implant impressions.International journal of implant dentistry · 2026Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Conventional and Digital Workflow Impressions for Implant-Supported Restorations.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Synergistic role of oral and maxillofacial surgery and prosthodontics in implant-based rehabilitation: a scoping review protocol.BDJ open · 2026Review
- Accuracy of master casts fabricated for "all on 4" and "all on 6" implant situation in maxillary arch as influenced by the number of digital scan bodies: An in vitro comparative study.Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Digital Imaging Accuracy Among Three Intraoral Scanners for Full-Arch Implant Rehabilitation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Enhancing Prosthetic Workflow With Prototype Constructions in Dental Implant Treatment.Cureus · 2025Article
- Cellular responses to 3D printed dental resins produced using a manufacturer recommended printer versus a third party printer.The journal of advanced prosthodontics · 2024Article
- Evaluation of virtual handles for dental implant manipulation in virtual reality implant planning procedure.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2022Article
- Clinical Outcome of Fully Digital Workflow for Single-Implant-Supported Crowns: A Retrospective Clinical Study.Dentistry journal · 2022Article
- Integration of imaging modalities in digital dental workflows - possibilities, limitations, and potential future developments.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital workflow is increasingly accessible in daily dental practice. It has several benefits in implantology, such as the possibility of precise planning, which results in faster and safer surgery and, consequently, reduced prosthetic complications. There are also disadvantages that must be taken into consideration for successful treatment, such as deviations between the planned and placed implant position and intraoral scanning inaccuracies. We report a clinical case in implantology in which digital workflow was used throughout the process, pointing out its facilities and complications in the daily practice of dental surgeons. The patient had grade II mobility and external root resorption of tooth 11. After virtual planning, a surgical guide was fabricated by a CAD/CAM system, with immediate placement of a dental implant using the guided surgery technique. At the end of the osseointegration period, intraoral scanning was performed for fabrication of the final prosthesis also by a CAD/CAM system. After placement, the patient approved the aesthetic and functional results of the implant. We observed advantages such as simplification of clinical steps and safety of the proposed planning, but there were also disadvantages such as the complexity of digital tools, deviations of the placed implant, and inaccuracy in color selection. It was concluded that digital workflow is a reality that can be integrated into daily dental practice, resulting in greater safety, predictability of results, and ease of use in all clinical stages. However, it should be noted that there are still inaccuracies in digital tools and that a steep learning curve is needed in this area, which, if neglected, may lead to unsatisfactory results.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.