Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33628343›Full record

ArticlePharmacy practice

Self-medication consultations in community pharmacy: an exploratory study on teams' performance, client-reported outcomes and satisfaction.

Paulo Veiga, Afonso M Cavaco, Luís V Lapão, Mara P Guerreiro

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacy practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Role of Portuguese community pharmacy and pharmacists in self-care.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Paulo VeigaPhD. Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Lisbon . Lisbon ( Portugal ). paulojcveiga@ff.ulisboa.pt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7623-2973
Afonso M CavacoPhD. Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Lisbon . Lisbon ( Portugal ). acavaco@ff.ulisboa.pt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8466-0484
Luís V LapãoPhD. Institute of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (IHMT), Comprehensive Healthcare Research Center (CHRC) & Research and Development Unit in Mechanical and Industrial Engineering (UNIDEMI), Nova University Lisbon . Lisbon ( Portugal ). luis.lapao@ihmt.unl.pt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0506-1294
Mara P GuerreiroPhD. (CiiEM) Egas Moniz University Institute . Monte de Caparica ( Portugal ). mguerreiro@egasmoniz.edu.pt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8192-6080
University of Lisbon · PTEscola Superior de Saúde Egas Moniz · PTUniversidade Nova de Lisboa · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity pharmacy teams (CPTs) have an established role in assisting self-medication, contributing to the safe and effective use of non-prescription medicines.

objectiveThe study aimed to describe CPTs' performance in self-medication consultation, client-reported outcomes, and satisfaction. A secondary purpose was to develop an explanatory model for better understanding clients' satisfaction with this service.

methodsDescriptive, cross-sectional exploratory study. Data were collected in a purposive sample of pharmacy clients recruited in six community pharmacies in Portugal. CPTs adopted a structured approach to self-medication consultations, encompassing 11 quality criteria (five for case evaluation and six for counselling). An evaluation score, a counselling score and an overall quality score were estimated. Client-reported outcomes and satisfaction were ascertained via a follow-up telephone interview. Besides descriptive statistics, the association with several independent variables on the clients' overall satisfaction was explored, using linear regression.

resultsProduct-based dispensing was more frequent for lower educated clients. Reported compliance with the criteria by CPTs was overall high (93.95% of maximum compliance), mostly missing the 'other medication' questioning. Most clients (93%) reported improvement after the consultation. Clients' satisfaction score was 4.70 out of 5. The variables that seem to better explain clients' overall satisfaction are pharmacy loyalty, the evaluation score, and the female gender.

conclusionsClients' reported outcomes were favourable, as well as satisfaction with the service. Clients' satisfaction appears to be determined by consultation quality (evaluation score), suggesting the advancement of the pharmacists' clinical role. A larger study is warranted to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

Community Pharmacy ServicesCounselingCross-Sectional StudiesMultivariate AnalysisNonprescription DrugsPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPatient SatisfactionPharmaciesPortugalReferral and ConsultationSelf Medication

Identifiers

PMID33628343
PMCPMC7886312
OpenAlexW3128888875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.