Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33628335›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease2021

The value of anti-CarP and anti-PAD4 as markers of rheumatoid arthritis in ACPA/RF negative rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Bogdan Kolarz, Marek Ciesla, Ann K Rosenthal, Magdalena Dryglewska, Maria Majdan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Lung in Rheumatoid Arthritis-Friend or Enemy?International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  4. Redox Pathogenesis in Rheumatic Diseases.ACR open rheumatology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bogdan KolarzFaculty of Medicine, University of Rzeszow, Kopisto 2A, Rzeszow, 35-959, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8496-6846
Marek CieslaFaculty of Medicine, University of Rzeszow, Rzeszow, Poland.
Ann K RosenthalDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Magdalena DryglewskaDepartment of Rheumatology and Connective Tissue Disease, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Lubelskie, Poland.
Maria MajdanDepartment of Rheumatology and Connective Tissue Disease, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Lubelskie, Poland.
Medical University of Lublin · PLUniversity of Rzeszów · PLMedical College of Wisconsin · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) and rheumatoid factor (RF) are key factors in the American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism rheumatoid arthritis (RA) classification criteria markers. However, about 30% of patients diagnosed with RA are seronegative, rationalizing the need for new serologic markers for RA. Antibodies against carbamylated proteins (anti-CarP) and against peptidyl-arginine deiminase type 4 (anti-PAD4) have been postulated to be useful RA markers. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the value of anti-CarP and anti-PAD4 in a well-characterized population of RA patients and healthy controls (HCs).

methodsA total of 122 RA patients and 30 HCs were enrolled in the study. Serum levels of ACPA, anti-PAD4, anti-CarP and RF were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent immunoassays (ELISAs). Synthetic carbamylated peptides were used in the ELISA assay to determine the protein targets of the anti-CarP antibodies.

resultsRates of ACPA, RF, anti-PAD4 and anti-CarP positivity were 85.2%, 67.2%, 55.7% and 46.7% in RA, and 0%, 0%, 6.7% and 6.7% in HC respectively. In the RA population, 25.4% of patients had all four types of antibodies positive, while 6.6% had no antibodies. There was a significant correlation between anti-PAD4 and ACPAs (

conclusionAnti-CarP but not anti-PAD4 may be a useful biomarker in identifying ACPA/RF negative RA patients. This antibody may identify an additional RA population who may benefit from early implementation of aggressive therapy.

Indexed as

anti-CarPanti-PAD4DNA methylationRA markersRheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID33628335
PMCPMC7882754
OpenAlexW3132850756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.