ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2021
Enhanced Comprehensive Learning Particle Swarm Optimization with Dimensional Independent and Adaptive Parameters.
Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancing particle swarm optimization based on optical computing mechanism: application to dyslexia detection.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Comprehensive learning particle swarm optimization (CLPSO) and enhanced CLPSO (ECLPSO) are two literature metaheuristics for global optimization. ECLPSO significantly improves the exploitation and convergence performance of CLPSO by perturbation-based exploitation and adaptive learning probabilities. However, ECLPSO still cannot locate the global optimum or find a near-optimum solution for a number of problems. In this paper, we study further bettering the exploration performance of ECLPSO. We propose to assign an independent inertia weight and an independent acceleration coefficient corresponding to each dimension of the search space, as well as an independent learning probability for each particle on each dimension. Like ECLPSO, a normative interval bounded by the minimum and maximum personal best positions is determined with respect to each dimension in each generation. The dimensional independent maximum velocities, inertia weights, acceleration coefficients, and learning probabilities are proposed to be adaptively updated based on the dimensional normative intervals in order to facilitate exploration, exploitation, and convergence, particularly exploration. Our proposed metaheuristic, called adaptive CLPSO (ACLPSO), is evaluated on various benchmark functions. Experimental results demonstrate that the dimensional independent and adaptive maximum velocities, inertia weights, acceleration coefficients, and learning probabilities help to significantly mend ECLPSO's exploration performance, and ACLPSO is able to derive the global optimum or a near-optimum solution on all the benchmark functions for all the runs with parameters appropriately set.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.