Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33628052›Full record

ArticleCancer management and research2021

Antiemetic Efficacy of Adding Olanzapine 5 mg to Aprepitant, Palonosetron and Dexamethasone-Sparing After Day Two for Cancer Patients Receiving Anthracycline and Cyclophosphamide.

Marii Suehiro, Yasuyuki Kojima, Masaki Takahashi, Yuka Ito, Takayuki Keira, Kiwako Ikegawa, Hiroko Minatogawa, Koichiro Tsugawa, Tsuneaki Tanaka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer management and research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marii Suehiro *Department of Pharmacy, St. Marianna University School of Medicine Hospital, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-0710-2726
Yasuyuki Kojima *Division of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, St. Marianna University School of Medicine Hospital, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9991-0228
Masaki Takahashi *Division of Medical Informatics, St. Marianna University School of Medicine Hospital, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan.
Yuka ItoDepartment of Pharmacy, Kawasaki Municipal Tama Hospital, Kawasak-shi, Kanagawa, 214-8525, Japan.
Takayuki KeiraDepartment of Pharmacy, St. Marianna University School of Medicine Hospital, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6689-7274
Kiwako IkegawaDepartment of Pharmacy, St. Marianna University School of Medicine Hospital, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan.
Hiroko MinatogawaDepartment of Pharmacy, St. Marianna University School of Medicine Hospital, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan.
Koichiro TsugawaDivision of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, St. Marianna University School of Medicine Hospital, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan.
Tsuneaki TanakaDepartment of Pharmacy, St. Marianna University School of Medicine Hospital, Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa, 216-8511, Japan.
St. Marianna University School of Medicine · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeChemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) decrease patient quality of life (QOL). We evaluated the efficacy of adding 5 mg Olz to a three-drug steroid-sparing antiemetic regimen (aprepitant, palonosetron, and dexamethasone-sparing after day two) for breast cancer (BC) patients receiving anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide (AC) chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the records of 177 BC patients with no previous highly emetogenic chemotherapy history receiving AC plus the steroid-sparing three-drug regimen or the steroid-sparing four-drug regimen including Olz 5mg at our hospital between January 2012 and December 2018. The primary endpoint was complete response (CR), defined as no vomiting and no usage of rescue medication during the first AC cycle. We analyzed the odds ratio (OR) of the CR with 95% confidence interval (CI) in the three-drug group against the four-drug group. The OR was adjusted for types of anticancer drugs by the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test. Secondary endpoints were incidences of nausea, anorexia, fatigue, and somnolence during the first cycle.

resultsCompared to the three-drug group, the four-drug group demonstrated high incidence of no vomiting (71% vs 95%), a similar incidence of no rescue medication usage (50% vs 51%), and a similar CR rate (45% vs 49%). The OR of the CR rate in the three-drug group against the four-drug group after CMH adjustment for drug type was 0.958 (95% CI, 0.46-1.98). Compared to the three-drug group, the four-drug group demonstrated identical incidence of nausea (66%), but lower incidences of anorexia (78% vs 35%) and fatigue (86% vs 73%). The incidence of somnolence in the four-drug group was 49%. We did not have data of somnolence for the three-drug group in the records.

conclusionAdding 5 mg Olz to the steroid-sparing three-drug combination can reduce vomiting, anorexia, and fatigue, although there was no difference in CR rate.

Indexed as

antiemeticsbreast cancerchemotherapy induced nausea and vomitinghighly emetogenic chemotherapy

Identifiers

PMID33628052
PMCPMC7898054
OpenAlexW3130234083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.