Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33627983›Full record

ArticleJournal of human reproductive sciences

Resuming Assisted Reproduction Services during COVID-19 Pandemic: An Initial Indian Experience.

Padma Rekha Jirge, Sadhana Patwardhan, Shishir Narendra Jirge, Deepali A Bhomkar, Shruti M Chougule, Anita Salpekar, Deepak Modi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human reproductive sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Obstetric challenges during COVID-19 pandemic: A narrative review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2021
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Padma Rekha JirgeDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Sushrut Assisted Conception Clinic & Shreyas Hospital, Kolhapur, India.
Sadhana PatwardhanDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Nagpur Test Tube Baby Centre, Nagpur, India.
Shishir Narendra JirgeDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Sushrut Assisted Conception Clinic & Shreyas Hospital, Kolhapur, India.
Deepali A BhomkarDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Sushrut Assisted Conception Clinic & Shreyas Hospital, Kolhapur, India.
Shruti M ChouguleDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Sushrut Assisted Conception Clinic & Shreyas Hospital, Kolhapur, India.
Anita SalpekarDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Nagpur Test Tube Baby Centre, Nagpur, India.
Deepak ModiMolecular and Cellular Biology Laboratory, ICMR-National Institute for Research in Rproductive Health, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
National Institute for Research in Reproductive Health · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe pandemic of COVID-19 has affected many countries and medical services including assisted reproductive treatment (ART) have been hampered.

aimThe study was conducted to assess the preparedness of ART clinics and staff to resume services; patients' reasons to initiate treatment; and key performance indicators (KPIs) of ART laboratories during the pandemic. SETTING AND

designThis was a semidescriptive, prospective study in two private MATERIALS AND

methodsTime required for replenishing consumables and clinic preparedness to function under "new norms" of pandemic was documented. Infection mitigation measures and triaging strategy were evaluated. KPIs following resumption were analyzed. The Student's

resultsThirty percent of the patients consulted through telemedicine accepted or were eligible to initiate treatment on clinic resumption. Lack of safe transport and financial constraints prevented majority from undergoing IVF, and 9% delayed treatment due to fear of pandemic. With adequate training, staff compliance to meet new demands was achieved within a week, but procuring consumables and injections was time-consuming. Fifty-two cycles of IVF were performed including fresh and frozen embryo transfers with satisfactory KPIs even during pandemic. Conscious sedation and analgesia during oocyte retrieval were associated with reduced procedure time and no intervention for airway maintenance compared to general anesthesia. Self-reported pain scores by patients ranged from nil to mild on a graphic rating scale.

conclusionsThis study provides practical insight for the resumption of IVF services during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

Assisted reproductioncoronavirusesCOVID-19 pandemickey performance indicatorsresumption of in vitro fertilizationSARS

Identifiers

PMID33627983
PMCPMC7879848
OpenAlexW3114044809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.