ArticleJournal of human reproductive sciences
Role of Gene Xpert in the Detection of Genital Tuberculosis in Endometrial Tissue among Women with Infertility.
Article in Journal of human reproductive sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cervical Tuberculosis in the Postmenopausal Period: A Case of Mistaken Identity With Carcinoma.Cureus · 2025Article
- Review
- Article
- Female Genital Tuberculosis.Open forum infectious diseases · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of the study is to evaluate the clinical utility of Gene Xpert compared with other available diagnostic modalities in prompt diagnosis of female genital tuberculosis (TB) causing infertility. MATERIAL AND
methodsThis was a prospective, cross-sectional analytical study. Premenstrual endometrial biopsy specimens were collected from 176 infertile women of reproductive age group suspected of having genital TB. Samples were processed for acid-fast bacilli, culture, histopathology, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and Gene Xpert. Patients detected positive on Gene Xpert and PCR were subjected to laparoscopy to look for affirmative findings of genital TB. The results were analyzed using composite gold standard consisting of patients positive with culture, histopathology, and laparoscopy.
resultsA total of 18 patients were found positive using composite gold standard. Laparoscopy was positive in 15 patients, whereas culture and histopathology were positive in three and two patients, respectively. Gene Xpert was positive in two patients. None of them was detected with rifampicin resistance. The sensitivity of Gene Xpert was 11.11% whereas the specificity was 100%.
conclusionSince genital TB is a paucibacillary disease, multiple diagnostic modalities are needed for diagnosis. Gene Xpert appears to be a useful modality in diagnosis of genital TB, owing to its high specificity, and can be recommended in conditions where microscopy, culture, and histopathology are negative; however, further randomized studies are required to support our hypothesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.