Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33627748›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2021

Real-time clinician text feeds from electronic health records.

James T H Teo, Vlad Dinu, William Bernal, Phil Davidson, Vitaliy Oliynyk, Cormac Breen, Richard D Barker, Richard J B Dobson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Natural language processing data services for healthcare providers.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Early detection of COVID-19 outbreaks using textual analysis of electronic medical records.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

James T H TeoKings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom. jamesteo@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6899-8319
Vlad DinuInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.
William BernalKings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6508-3287
Phil DavidsonKings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Vitaliy OliynykGuys & St Thomas Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Cormac BreenGuys & St Thomas Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Richard D BarkerKings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Richard J B DobsonInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, Kings College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_17214
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analyses of search engine and social media feeds have been attempted for infectious disease outbreaks, but have been found to be susceptible to artefactual distortions from health scares or keyword spamming in social media or the public internet. We describe an approach using real-time aggregation of keywords and phrases of freetext from real-time clinician-generated documentation in electronic health records to produce a customisable real-time viral pneumonia signal providing up to 4 days warning for secondary care capacity planning. This low-cost approach is open-source, is locally customisable, is not dependent on any specific electronic health record system and can provide an ensemble of signals if deployed at multiple organisational scales.

Identifiers

PMID33627748
PMCPMC7904856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.