Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33627728›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Mutations introduced in susceptibility genes through CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing confer increased late blight resistance in potatoes.

Nam Phuong Kieu, Marit Lenman, Eu Sheng Wang, Bent Larsen Petersen, Erik Andreasson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
38.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 224 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Genome Editing in Root and Tuber Crop Development in Sub-Saharan Africa.Plant-environment interactions (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Advances in CRISPR Plant Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  10. From Lab to Field: CRISPRing Major CultivatedInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Genome editing of susceptibility geneFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. CRISPR-Cas Gene Editing Technology in Potato.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nam Phuong KieuDepartment of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden.
Marit LenmanDepartment of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden.
Eu Sheng WangDepartment of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden.
Bent Larsen PetersenDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsen's vej 40, 1871, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Erik AndreassonDepartment of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden. erik.andreasson@slu.se.
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of pathogen-resistant cultivars is expected to increase yield and decrease fungicide use in agriculture. However, in potato breeding, increased resistance obtained via resistance genes (R-genes) is hampered because R-gene(s) are often specific for a pathogen race and can be quickly overcome by the evolution of the pathogen. In parallel, susceptibility genes (S-genes) are important for pathogenesis, and loss of S-gene function confers increased resistance in several plants, such as rice, wheat, citrus and tomatoes. In this article, we present the mutation and screening of seven putative S-genes in potatoes, including two DMR6 potato homologues. Using a CRISPR/Cas9 system, which conferred co-expression of two guide RNAs, tetra-allelic deletion mutants were generated and resistance against late blight was assayed in the plants. Functional knockouts of StDND1, StCHL1, and DMG400000582 (StDMR6-1) generated potatoes with increased resistance against late blight. Plants mutated in StDND1 showed pleiotropic effects, whereas StDMR6-1 and StCHL1 mutated plants did not exhibit any growth phenotype, making them good candidates for further agricultural studies. Additionally, we showed that DMG401026923 (here denoted StDMR6-2) knockout mutants did not demonstrate any increased late blight resistance, but exhibited a growth phenotype, indicating that StDMR6-1 and StDMR6-2 have different functions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on the mutation and screening of putative S-genes in potatoes, including two DMR6 potato homologues.

Indexed as

CitrusCRISPR-Cas SystemsDisease ResistanceGene EditingMutationOryzaPhenotypePlant BreedingPlant DiseasesPlant ProteinsPlants, Genetically ModifiedSolanum lycopersicumSolanum tuberosumPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID33627728
PMCPMC7904907
OpenAlexW3129613557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.