Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33627507›Full record

ArticlemSphere2021

The

Zhu Han, Dianguang Xiong, Zhiye Xu, Tingli Liu, Chengming Tian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSphere, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Targeting the EffectorFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Identification and Functional Analysis ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. A putative terpene cyclase gene (Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. A Putative Effector CcSp84 ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhu HanThe Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of Ministry of Education, College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Dianguang XiongThe Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of Ministry of Education, College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China xiongdianguang@126.com chengmt@bjfu.edu.cn.
Zhiye XuThe Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of Ministry of Education, College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Tingli LiuProvincial Key Laboratory of Agrobiology, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing, China.
Chengming TianThe Key Laboratory for Silviculture and Conservation of Ministry of Education, College of Forestry, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China xiongdianguang@126.com chengmt@bjfu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-3352-7664
Beijing Forestry University · CNJiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Canker disease is caused by the fungus

Indexed as

Plant ImmunityAscomycotaCell DeathCell NucleusFungal ProteinsNicotianaPlant DiseasesVirulenceVirulence FactorsFungal ProteinsVirulence FactorsCytospora chrysospermaplant immunitysubcellular localizationvirulence effector

Identifiers

PMID33627507
PMCPMC8544888
OpenAlexW3129471811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.