Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33627502›Full record

ArticleMolecular cancer research : MCR2021

Development and Characterization of Novel Endoxifen-Resistant Breast Cancer Cell Lines Highlight Numerous Differences from Tamoxifen-Resistant Models.

Calley J Jones, Malayannan Subramaniam, Michael J Emch, Elizabeth S Bruinsma, James N Ingle, Matthew P Goetz, John R Hawse

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cancer research : MCR, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Calley J JonesDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Malayannan SubramaniamDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Michael J EmchDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Elizabeth S BruinsmaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
James N IngleDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0003-1257-7731
Matthew P GoetzDepartment of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
John R HawseDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. hawse.john@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

The Role of CHFR in Tumorigenesis and Paclitaxel-Sensitivity in Breast CancerP50CA116201 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Fergus Joseph Couch · 2005 to 2026
$49.9M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA116201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the availability of drugs that target ERα-positive breast cancer, resistance commonly occurs, resulting in relapse, metastasis, and death. Tamoxifen remains the most commonly-prescribed endocrine therapy worldwide, and "tamoxifen resistance" has been extensively studied. However, little consideration has been given to the role of endoxifen, the most abundant active tamoxifen metabolite detected in patients, in driving resistance mechanisms. Endoxifen functions differently from the parent drug and other primary metabolites, including 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen (4HT). Many studies have shown that patients who extensively metabolize tamoxifen into endoxifen have superior outcomes relative to patients who do not, supporting a primary role for endoxifen in driving tamoxifen responses. Therefore, "tamoxifen resistance" may be better modeled by "endoxifen resistance" for some patients. Here, we report the development of novel endoxifen-resistant breast cancer cell lines and have extensively compared these models to 4HT and fulvestrant (ICI)-resistant models. Endoxifen-resistant cells were phenotypically and molecularly distinct from 4HT-resistant cells and more closely resembled ICI-resistant cells overall. Specifically, endoxifen resistance was associated with ERα and PR loss, estrogen insensitivity, unique gene signatures, and striking resistance to most FDA-approved second- and third-line therapies. Given these findings, and the importance of endoxifen in the efficacy of tamoxifen therapy, our data indicate that endoxifen-resistant models may be more clinically relevant than existing models and suggest that a better understanding of endoxifen resistance could substantially improve patient care. IMPLICATIONS: Here we report on the development and characterization of the first endoxifen-resistant models and demonstrate that endoxifen resistance may better model tamoxifen resistance in a subset of patients.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBlotting, WesternBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCell MovementCell ProliferationDrug Resistance, NeoplasmEstrogen Receptor alphaFemaleFulvestrantGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMCF-7 CellsReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionTamoxifen4-hydroxy-N-desmethyltamoxifenafimoxifeneAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalEstrogen Receptor alphaFulvestrantTamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID33627502
PMCPMC8178211
OpenAlexW3131133337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.