Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33627435›Full record

ArticleScience advances2021

Thomas C Prang, Kristen Ramirez, Mark Grabowski, Scott A Williams

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Environmental Context of Hominin Foot Evolution.American journal of biological anthropology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Whole-bone shape of hominoid manual proximal phalanges.Anatomical record (Hoboken, N.J. : 2007) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. How bipedalism shapes humans' actions with hand tools.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A functional framework for interpreting phalangeal form.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Baboon perspectives on the ecology and behavior of early human ancestors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  19. Predicting Archaic Hominin Phenotypes from Genomic Data.Annual review of genomics and human genetics · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Thomas C PrangDepartment of Anthropology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA. prang@tamu.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3032-8309
Kristen RamirezNew York Consortium in Evolutionary Primatology, New York, NY 10024, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7521-9996
Mark GrabowskiResearch Centre in Evolutionary Anthropology and Palaeoecology, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7045-9472
Scott A WilliamsNew York Consortium in Evolutionary Primatology, New York, NY 10024, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7860-8962
Texas A&M University · USThe Graduate Center, CUNY · USUniversity of Oslo · NOUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The morphology and positional behavior of the last common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees are critical for understanding the evolution of bipedalism. Early 20th century anatomical research supported the view that humans evolved from a suspensory ancestor bearing some resemblance to apes. However, the hand of the 4.4-million-year-old hominin

Indexed as

HominidaePan troglodytesAnimalsBiological EvolutionFossilsHumansPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID33627435
PMCPMC7904256
OpenAlexW3129931024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.