ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2021
Detection of Tick-Borne Bacteria from Whole Blood Using 16S Ribosomal RNA Gene PCR Followed by Next-Generation Sequencing.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- High throughput sequencing in the diagnosis and surveillance of tick-borne diseases: A narrative review.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Review
- Spatiotemporal and tissue-specific dynamics of bacterial communities in adult femaleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Update on North American tick-borne diseases and how to diagnose them.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2025Review
- Why an Integrated Approach to Tick-Borne Pathogens (Bacterial, Viral, and Parasitic) Is Important in the Diagnosis of Clinical Cases.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2024Review
- Diversity of Anaplasmataceae Transmitted by Ticks (Ixodidae) and the First Molecular Evidence ofMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Targeted Versus Shotgun Metagenomic Sequencing-based Detection of Microorganisms in Sonicate Fluid for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Diagnosis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023Article
- Differential microbial composition in parasitic vs. questing ticks based on 16S next-generation sequencing.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reported cases of tick-borne diseases have steadily increased for more than a decade. In the United States, a majority of tick-borne infections are caused by bacteria. Clinical diagnosis may be challenging, as tick-borne diseases can present with similar symptoms. Laboratory diagnosis has historically relied on serologic methods, which have limited utility during the acute phase of disease. Pathogen-specific molecular methods have improved early diagnosis, but can be expensive when bundled together and may miss unexpected or novel pathogens. To address these shortcomings, we developed a 16S rRNA gene PCR with a next-generation sequencing (NGS) approach to detect tick-borne bacteria in whole blood. A workflow was optimized by comparing combinations of two extraction platforms and two primer sets, ultimately pursuing DNA extraction from blood with the MagNA Pure 96 and PCR amplification using dual-priming oligonucleotide primers specific to the V1-V3 region of the 16S rRNA gene. The amplified product underwent modified Illumina 16S metagenomics sequencing library preparation and sequencing on a MiSeq V2 Nano flow cell, with data analysis using Pathogenomix RipSeq NGS software. Results with the developed method were compared to those from a V1-V2 16S rRNA gene primer set described by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The V1-V3 assay demonstrated equivalent performance to the CDC assay, with each method showing concordance with targeted PCR results in 31 of 32 samples, and detecting 22 of 23 expected organisms. These data demonstrate the potential for using a broad-range bacterial detection approach for diagnosis of tick-borne bacterial infection from blood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.