Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33627182›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2021

Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring perceived maternal care quality in low- to high-income countries: a scoping review protocol.

Kyrah K Brown, Godfred O Boateng, Peace Ossom-Williamson, Laura Haygood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kyrah K BrownDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Texas at Arlington, 500 W. Nedderman Drive, Box 19407, Arlington, TX, 76019-0407, USA. kyrah.brown@uta.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7028-6791
Godfred O BoatengDepartment of Kinesiology, University of Texas at Arlington, 500 W. Nedderman Drive, Box 19407, Arlington, TX, 76019-0407, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5898-6966
Peace Ossom-WilliamsonResearch Data Services, UTA Libraries, University of Texas at Arlington, 702 Planetarium Place, Arlington, TX, 76019, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6229-7514
Laura HaygoodGibson D. Lewis Health Science Library, University of North Texas Health Science Center, 3500 Camp Bowie Blvd, Fort Worth, TX, 76107, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4336-8203

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth practitioners and researchers must be able to measure and assess maternal care quality in facilities to monitor, intervene, and reduce global maternal mortality rates. On the global scale, there is a general lack of consensus on how maternal care quality is defined, conceptualized, and measured. Much of the literature addressing this problem has focused primarily on defining, conceptualizing, and measuring clinical indicators of maternal care quality. Less attention has been given in this regard to perceived maternal care quality among women which is known to influence care utilization and adherence. Therefore, there is a need to map the literature focused on defining, conceptualizing, and measuring perceived maternal care quality across low-, middle-, and high-income country contexts.

methodsThis scoping review protocol will follow the Arksey and O'Malley methodological framework. A comprehensive search strategy will be used to search for articles published from inception to 2020 in Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, AMED, and WHO Global Index Medicus. Gray literature will be included. Two independent reviewers will screen articles by title and abstract, then by full-text based on pre-determined inclusion/exclusion criteria. A third reviewer will arbitrate any discrepancies. This protocol outlines a four-step analytic approach that includes numerical, graphical, tabular, and narrative summaries to provide a comprehensive description of the body of literature. DISCUSSION: The findings from this scoping review will provide a comprehensive overview of the existing evidence on perceived maternal care quality. The findings are expected to inform future work on building consensus around the definition and conceptualization of perceived maternal care quality, and lay the groundwork for future research aimed at developing measures of perceived maternal care quality that can be applied across country contexts. Consequently, this review may aid in facilitating coordinated efforts to measure and improve maternal care quality across diverse country contexts (i.e., low-, middle-, and high-income country contexts). REVIEW REGISTRATION: This scoping review has been registered in the Open Science Framework (osf.io/k8nqh).

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesDelivery of Health CareDeveloped CountriesFemaleHumansIncomePregnancyQuality of Health CareScoping Reviews as TopicMaternal mortalityMeasurementQuality of careScoping review

Identifiers

PMID33627182
PMCPMC7903867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.