Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33627168›Full record

ArticleTrials2021

MR CLEAN-LATE, a multicenter randomized clinical trial of endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke in The Netherlands for late arrivals: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

F A V Anne Pirson, Wouter H Hinsenveld, Robert-Jan B Goldhoorn, Julie Staals, Inger R de Ridder, Wim H van Zwam, Marianne A A van Walderveen, Geert J Lycklama À Nijeholt, Maarten Uyttenboogaart, Wouter J Schonewille and 6 more

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. M2 vessel occlusion characteristics and outcome after endovascular therapy: A post-hoc pooled analysis of MR CLEAN MED, NO-IV and LATE.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

F A V Anne PirsonDepartment of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Postbus 5800, Maastricht, 6202 AZ, The Netherlands.
Wouter H HinsenveldDepartment of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Postbus 5800, Maastricht, 6202 AZ, The Netherlands.
Robert-Jan B GoldhoornDepartment of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Postbus 5800, Maastricht, 6202 AZ, The Netherlands.
Julie StaalsDepartment of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Postbus 5800, Maastricht, 6202 AZ, The Netherlands.
Inger R de RidderDepartment of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Postbus 5800, Maastricht, 6202 AZ, The Netherlands.
Wim H van ZwamDepartment of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Marianne A A van WalderveenDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Geert J Lycklama À NijeholtDepartment of Radiology, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Maarten UyttenboogaartDepartment of Neurology and Department of Radiology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Wouter J SchonewilleDepartment of Neurology, Sint Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
Aad van der LugtDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Diederik W J DippelDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Yvo B W E M RoosDepartment of Neurology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Charles B L M MajoieDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Robert J van OostenbruggeDepartment of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Postbus 5800, Maastricht, 6202 AZ, The Netherlands. r.van.oostenbrugge@mumc.nl.
MR CLEAN-LATE investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndovascular therapy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke due to proximal occlusion of the anterior intracranial circulation, started within 6 h from symptom onset, has been proven safe and effective. Recently, EVT has been proven effective beyond the 6-h time window in a highly selected population using CT perfusion or MR diffusion. Unfortunately, these imaging modalities are not available in every hospital, and strict selection criteria might exclude patients who could still benefit from EVT. The presence of collaterals on CT angiography (CTA) may offer a more pragmatic imaging criterion that predicts possible benefit from EVT beyond 6 h from time last known well. The aim of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of EVT for patients treated between 6 and 24 h from time last known well after selection based on the presence of collateral flow.

methodsThe MR CLEAN-LATE trial is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint trial, aiming to enroll 500 patients. We will investigate the efficacy of EVT between 6 and 24 h from time last known well in acute ischemic stroke due to a proximal intracranial anterior circulation occlusion confirmed by CTA or MRA. Patients with any collateral flow (poor, moderate, or good collaterals) on CTA will be included. The inclusion of poor collateral status will be restricted to a maximum of 100 patients. In line with the current Dutch guidelines, patients who fulfill the characteristics of included patients in DAWN and DEFUSE 3 will be excluded as they are eligible for EVT as standard care. The primary endpoint is functional outcome at 90 days, assessed with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Treatment effect will be estimated with ordinal logistic regression (shift analysis) on the mRS at 90 days. Secondary endpoints include clinical stroke severity at 24 h and 5-7 days assessed by the NIHSS, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, recanalization at 24 h, follow-up infarct size, and mortality at 90 days, DISCUSSION: This study will provide insight into whether EVT is safe and effective for patients treated between 6 and 24 h from time last known well after selection based on the presence of collateral flow on CTA.

trial registrationNL58246.078.17 , ISRCTN19922220 , Registered on 11 December 2017.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaEndovascular ProceduresIschemic StrokeStrokeHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicNetherlandsPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicThrombectomyTreatment OutcomeAcute ischemic strokeEndovascular treatmentLate arrivalsRandomized controlled trialThrombectomy

Identifiers

PMID33627168
PMCPMC7903604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.