Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33627113›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2021

Prioritization of predisposing factors of gingival hyperplasia during orthodontic treatment: the role of amount of biofilm.

Séverine Vincent-Bugnas, Leslie Borsa, Apolline Gruss, Laurence Lupi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Séverine Vincent-BugnasDépartement de parodontologie, Université Côte d'Azur, UFR Odontologie, 24 Avenue des diables bleus, 06300, Nice, France. Severine.VINCENT@univ-cotedazur.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-7782-0558
Leslie BorsaPôle d'Odontologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, 5 Rue Pierre Dévoluy, 06000, Nice, France.
Apolline GrussPôle d'Odontologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, 5 Rue Pierre Dévoluy, 06000, Nice, France.
Laurence LupiPôle d'Odontologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, 5 Rue Pierre Dévoluy, 06000, Nice, France.
Université Côte d'Azur · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe mechanism of gingival growth that may occur during fixed orthodontic treatment is not yet fully understood and the amount of dental plaque is often incriminated. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of gingival growth during multi-attachment orthodontic treatment and to prioritize its predicting factors, especially the quantity of biofilm.

methodsThis comprehensive cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on orthodontic patients aged 9 to 30 years, in good health, treated by a fixed appliance. Periodontal clinical parameters such as plaque index, gingival index, probing pocket depth, periodontal phenotype and gingival enhancement index were recorded. Likewise, the brushing habits and the date of the last scaling were noted. The orthodontic parameters studied were the duration of the treatment, the type of bracket, the alloys used for the arches and the type of ligatures. Descriptive statistics were carried out, and variables presenting p value < 0.25 were included in a multivariate analysis to calculate the Odds Ratio (OR) of gingival enlargement".

resultsA total of 193 patients were included (16.38 ± 4.89 years). Gingival growth occurred for 49.7% of patients included. The predisposing factors for this pathology during fixed orthodontic treatment were conventional metal brackets (p = 0.021), mouth breathing (p = 0.040), male gender (p = 0.035), thick periodontal phenotype (p = 0.043), elastomeric ligations (p = 0.007), duration of treatment (p = 0.022) and presence of plaque (p = 0.004). After achievement of the logistic regression, only two factors remained related to gingival enlargement: metallic brackets (OR: 3.5, 95% CI: 1.1-10.55) and duration of treatment (OR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.01-4.08). The amount of plaque would not be directly related to the development of gingival increase during orthodontic treatment.

conclusionsAmong the predisposing factors that underlie gingival growth during multi-attachment therapy, the amount of plaque is not found. The qualitative assessment of the plaque and its evolution during treatment could clarify the role of the biofilm in the occurrence of gingival overgrowth.

Indexed as

Dental PlaqueGingival HyperplasiaOrthodontic BracketsAdolescentAdultBiofilmsCausalityChildCross-Sectional StudiesDental Plaque IndexHumansMaleYoung AdultDental plaqueGingival overgrowthOrthodontic treatmentRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID33627113
PMCPMC7903590
OpenAlexW3122382328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.