Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33627099›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2021

Lasting consequences of psyllid (Bactericera cockerelli L.) infestation on tomato defense, gene expression, and growth.

Kyle Harrison, Azucena Mendoza-Herrera, Julien Gad Levy, Cecilia Tamborindeguy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kyle HarrisonUSDA-ARS, Agroecosystem Management Research Unit, Lincoln, NE, 68503, USA. kyle.harrison@usda.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2694-7385
Azucena Mendoza-HerreraDepartment of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Julien Gad LevyDepartment of Horticultural Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Cecilia TamborindeguyDepartment of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77843, USA.
Texas A&M University · USAgricultural Research Service · US

Funding

A&M AgriLife Research Insect Vector Disease Grant Program 06-L701774National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2017-67013-26564
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe tomato psyllid, Bactericera cockerelli Šulc (Hemiptera: Triozidae), is a pest of solanaceous crops such as tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) in the U.S. and vectors the disease-causing pathogen 'Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum'. Currently, the only effective strategies for controlling the diseases associated with this pathogen involve regular pesticide applications to manage psyllid population density. However, such practices are unsustainable and will eventually lead to widespread pesticide resistance in psyllids. Therefore, new control strategies must be developed to increase host-plant resistance to insect vectors. For example, expression of constitutive and inducible plant defenses can be improved through selection. Currently, it is still unknown whether psyllid infestation has any lasting consequences on tomato plant defense or tomato plant gene expression in general.

resultsIn order to characterize the genes putatively involved in tomato defense against psyllid infestation, RNA was extracted from psyllid-infested and uninfested tomato leaves (Moneymaker) 3 weeks post-infestation. Transcriptome analysis identified 362 differentially expressed genes. These differentially expressed genes were primarily associated with defense responses to abiotic/biotic stress, transcription/translation, cellular signaling/transport, and photosynthesis. These gene expression changes suggested that tomato plants underwent a reduction in plant growth/health in exchange for improved defense against stress that was observable 3 weeks after psyllid infestation. Consistent with these observations, tomato plant growth experiments determined that the plants were shorter 3 weeks after psyllid infestation. Furthermore, psyllid nymphs had lower survival rates on tomato plants that had been previously psyllid infested.

conclusionThese results suggested that psyllid infestation has lasting consequences for tomato gene expression, defense, and growth.

Indexed as

AnimalsGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenes, PlantHemipteraHost-Parasite InteractionsPlant ImmunitySolanum lycopersicumBactericera cockerelli Šulc‘Candidatus Liberibacter solanacearum’Plant-insect interactionsPotatoPsyllidSolanum lycopersicum L.TranscriptomicsZebra chip

Identifiers

PMID33627099
PMCPMC7905647
OpenAlexW3130417906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.