Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33627095›Full record

Observational studyRespiratory research2021

Sputum sample positivity for Haemophilus influenzae or Moraxella catarrhalis in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: evaluation of association with positivity at earlier stable disease timepoints.

Lucio Malvisi, Laura Taddei, Aparna Yarraguntla, Tom M A Wilkinson, Ashwani Kumar Arora, AERIS Study Group

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Respiratory research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01360398 (Contribution of Infectious Pathogens to Acute Respiratory Illness in Adults and Elderly), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01360398 nacompletednot on this map

Contribution of Infectious Pathogens to Acute Respiratory Illness in Adults and Elderly

TypeinterventionalSponsorGlaxoSmithKlineRan2011 to 2014Enrolled127ConditionsRespiratory DisordersArmsBlood sample, Sputum sample, Nasopharyngeal swab, Urine sample, End tidal breath sample
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lucio MalvisiGSK, Siena, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6551-5038
Laura TaddeiGSK, Siena, Italy. laura.x.taddei@gsk.com.
Aparna YarraguntlaICON, Chennai, India c/o GSK, Wavre, Belgium.
Tom M A WilkinsonFaculty of Medicine and Institute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Ashwani Kumar AroraGSK, Siena, Italy.
AERIS Study Group
Southampton General Hospital · GBUniversity of Siena · IT

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfection with Haemophilus influenzae (Hi) or Moraxella catarrhalis (Mcat) is a risk factor for exacerbation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The ability to predict Hi- or Mcat-associated exacerbations may be useful for interventions developed to reduce exacerbation frequency.

methodsIn a COPD observational study, sputum samples were collected at monthly stable-state visits and at exacerbation during two years of follow-up. Bacterial species (Hi, Mcat) were identified by culture and quantitative PCR assay. Post-hoc analyses were conducted to assess: (1) first Hi- or Mcat-positive exacerbations given presence or absence of Hi or Mcat at the screening visit (stable-state timepoint); (2) first Hi- or Mcat-positive exacerbations given presence or absence of Hi or Mcat at stable timepoints within previous 90 days; (3) second Hi- or Mcat-positive exacerbations given presence or absence of Hi or Mcat at stable timepoints within previous 90 days. Percentages and risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated.

resultsPCR results for analyses 1, 2 and 3 (samples from 84, 88 and 83 subjects, respectively) showed that the risk of an Hi- or Mcat-positive exacerbation is significantly higher if sputum sample was Hi- or Mcat-positive than if Hi- or Mcat-negative at previous stable timepoints (apart from Mcat in analysis 3); RRs ranged from 2.1 to 3.2 for Hi and 1.9 to 2.6 for Mcat.For all analyses, the percentage of Hi- or Mcat-positive exacerbations given previous Hi- or Mcat-positive stable timepoints was higher than the percentage of Hi- or Mcat-positive exacerbations if Hi- or Mcat-negative at previous stable timepoints. Percentage of Hi- or Mcat-positive exacerbations given previous Hi- or Mcat-negative stable timepoints was 26.3%-37.0% for Hi and 17.6%-19.7% for Mcat.

conclusionsPresence of Hi or Mcat at a stable timepoint was associated with a higher risk of a subsequent Hi- or Mcat-associated exacerbation compared with earlier absence. However, a large percentage of Hi- or Mcat-associated exacerbations was not associated with Hi/Mcat detection at an earlier timepoint. This suggests that administration of an intervention to reduce these exacerbations should be independent of bacterial presence at baseline. Trial Registration https://clinicaltrials.gov/ ; NCT01360398, registered May 25, 2011.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overDNA, BacterialFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHaemophilus influenzaeHumansMaleMiddle AgedMoraxella catarrhalisProspective StudiesPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRecurrenceRisk FactorsSputumDNA, BacterialBacterial identificationCOPDCultureExacerbationHaemophilus influenzaeMoraxella catarrhalisPCRVaccination

Identifiers

PMID33627095
PMCPMC7903661
OpenAlexW3131292591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.