ArticleRespiration; international review of thoracic diseases
Utility of Bronchoscopy with Bronchoalveolar Lavage among Hematologic Transplant Recipients in the Era of Noninvasive Testing.
Article in Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Pulmonary Complications in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients-A Clinician Primer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPulmonary complications are common among hematologic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients. Their evaluation can be pursued through bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and a variety of available noninvasive studies, which include newer molecular markers for detecting a variety of infectious agents.
objectiveThe objective of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic yield of BAL among HSCT patients relative to the yield of noninvasive testing.
methodThis is a retrospective analysis of HSCT recipients who underwent both BAL and noninvasive testing at a cancer center in 2013 and 2014.
resultsThere were 210 diagnostic results among 98 HSCT recipients. There were 84 unique findings on noninvasive testing that were not evident on BAL, and 36 unique findings on BAL that were not evident on noninvasive testing. Noninvasive testing tended to yield bacterial and viral infections more commonly, while BAL yielded mycobacterial isolates more commonly.
conclusionWhile both noninvasive testing and BAL are helpful in this population, each appeared more precise than the other with individual lung diseases. Bronchoscopy with BAL and noninvasive testing should be considered complementary strategies in the workup of pulmonary complications among HSCT patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.