ArticleStem cell research2021
Knockout of the CEP290 gene in human induced pluripotent stem cells.
Article in Stem cell research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
CEP290 is a principal component of the primary cilium and is important for the proper function of ciliated cells. CEP290 mutations have been linked to numerous ciliopathies, with a wide range of phenotypic severities, but with poor genotype:phenotype correlation. Here we have used CRISPR/Cas9 technology to target the CEP290 gene and generate a line of induced pluripotent stem cells that lack detectable CEP290 expression, but retain a normal karyotype and differentiation potential. This line of cells will be useful for the study of disorders resulting from CEP290 mutations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.