ArticleNursing open2021
Research on safety in home care for older adults: A bibliometric analysis.
Article in Nursing open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Applications of AI/ML in accelerating the development of pulmonary drug delivery system.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Review
- Patient safety incidents in mental health residential services: a multicenter, crosssectional, survey-based study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Evaluating a caregiver-focused safety culture model: Effects on caregivers' safety perception, older adults' quality of life, and the incidence of adverse events in Indonesia.Belitung nursing journal · 2025Article
- Home Cancer Care Research: A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis (1990-2021).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Article
- Profiling the Research Landscape on Cognitive Aging: A Bibliometric Analysis and Network Visualization.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Review
- Research on safety in home care for older adults: A bibliometric analysis.Nursing open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis study aimed to describe and visualize the current research state and collaborative networks in home care safety for older adults over the past 11 years to analyse the gaps of research and future research trends.
backgroundThe amount of research on safety in home care for older adults is increasing. It is necessary to understand the status of development and main research topics and identify the main contributors and their relationships.
methodsA total of 2,631 publications were retrieved from the Web of Science. The external characteristics of the publications were summarized with the Web of Science and Histcite. Collaborative networks and keywords were analysed and visually displayed using analysis tools.
resultsThe number of articles increased over the years. Articles were identified from 79 countries, 3,630 institutions, 647 journals and 11,691 authors, and complex cooperative relations among them and five research topics were identified.
conclusionResearch on home care safety for older adults is developing steadily, and this field may be understood to a greater extent in the future. Countries, institutions and scholars need to cooperate more in this research field. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: This study contributes important information for understanding achievements in the research field of home care safety and provides insights into future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.