Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33626227›Full record

ReviewJournal of cosmetic dermatology2021

Impact of ultraviolet radiation and exposome on rosacea: Key role of photoprotection in optimizing treatment.

Daniel Morgado-Carrasco, Corinne Granger, Carles Trullas, Jaime Piquero-Casals

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. The cutaneous microbiome as a dynamic photoprotective interface against solar radiation.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2026
    Review
  3. The exposomal imprint on rosacea: More than skin deep.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Research progress in the role of ultraviolet in the pathogenesis of rosacea.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. DistinctFrontiers in microbiomes · 2024
    Article
  17. Diagnosing and Treating Rosacea in Skin of Color Patients.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Clinical Applications ofLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel Morgado-CarrascoDepartment of Dermatology, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4704-6132
Corinne GrangerInnovation and Development, ISDIN, Barcelona, Spain.
Carles TrullasInnovation and Development, ISDIN, Barcelona, Spain.
Jaime Piquero-CasalsClínica Dermatológica Multidisciplinar, Dermik, Barcelona, Spain.
Isdin (Spain) · ESHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ES

Funding

ISDIN
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPathophysiology of rosacea is not completely understood and involves a complex interaction among genetics, ultraviolet (UV) light, microorganisms, impaired skin barrier, neuronal and vascular dysfunction, and immune system disruption.

aimsTo describe the etiology of rosacea with an emphasis on the role of UV radiation and exposome, and to review the importance of non-pharmacologic strategies focusing on photoprotection.

methodsWe conducted a narrative review of the literature. We performed literature searches with PubMed from January 1990 to November 2020 using the keywords "rosacea", "pathogenesis", "ultraviolet radiation", "exposome", "photoprotection", "sunscreens" and "non-pharmacologic agents". The search was limited to English, Spanish, and French language articles.

resultsSeveral environmental factors such as UV light, diverse microorganisms, air pollution, tobacco smoking, nutrition, and psychological stress showed to trigger or worsen rosacea. UV radiation was reported to induce pro-inflammatory, pro-angiogenic, and pro-fibrotic responses. We found 6 original articles about the impact of sunscreens on rosacea. The use of sunscreens containing ingredients with emollient, anti-inflammatory, and/or vasoregulatory properties was shown to significantly improve symptomatology.

conclusionUV radiation and the exposome play a key role in the development of rosacea. UV light is implicated in all significant aspects of rosacea: skin inflammation, neoangiogenesis, telangiectasia, and fibrosis, and may even initiate rosacea. While the use of sunscreens is widely recommended, the literature on the impact of photoprotection in rosacea is scarce. Adequately formulated sunscreens could not only provide the required level of photoprotection, but may also help to mitigate the barrier dysfunction, neutralize facial redness (tinted sunscreens), and decrease inflammation and vascular dysfunction.

Indexed as

ExposomeRosaceaHumansSkinSunscreening AgentsUltraviolet RaysSunscreening Agentsexposomephotoprotectionrosaceasunscreensultraviolet radiation

Identifiers

PMID33626227
PMCPMC8596706
OpenAlexW3130107429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.