ReviewJournal of animal science2021
ASAS-NANP SYMPOSIUM: Applications of machine learning for livestock body weight prediction from digital images.
Review in Journal of animal science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.
- Batch-Level Average Market Weight Estimation and Interpretability Analysis for Pigs with Regional K-Means Clustering and AMFormer.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Recent Advances in Vision-Based Beef Cattle Body Measurement Technologies.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
- Impact of Mid-to-Late Gestational Overfeeding on Maternal Performance and Calf Outcomes in Hanwoo Cattle: A Machine Learning Approach.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Estimation of Ewe Live Weight and Carcass Traits Using Advanced Hybrid Deep Learning and Multimodal Feature Fusion.Biology · 2026Article
- UST-YOLO11Pose-TRM: An Attention-Enhanced Keypoint Detection and Transformer Regression Framework for Yak Body Measurement.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Early prediction of final body weight in Hanwoo steers using machine and deep learning models.Animal bioscience · 2026Article
- AI-powered industrial quality assurance system for fancy yarn using computer vision and 3D visualization.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Serial Correlations of Partial Body Weight and Feed Intake in Crossbred Cattle.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- ASAS-NANP symposium: mathematical modeling in animal nutrition: training the future generation in data and predictive analytics for sustainable development. A summary of the 2024 symposium.Journal of animal science · 2026Article
- ASAS-NANP Symposium: Mathematical modeling in animal nutrition: revolutionizing animal farming with artificial intelligence: trends, challenges, and opportunities.Journal of animal science · 2026Review
- Impacts of heat stress on growth performance and its mitigation in small ruminants.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2025Article
- Prediction of Body Mass of Dairy Cattle Using Machine Learning Algorithms Applied to Morphological Characteristics.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- ASAS-NANP SYMPOSIUM: Mathematical Modeling in Animal Nutrition: Training the Future Generation in Data and Predictive Analytics for Sustainable Development. A Summary of the 2023 Symposium.Journal of animal science · 2025Article
- Machine Vision Analysis of Ujumqin Sheep's Walking Posture and Body Size.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Non-Invasive Fish Biometrics for Enhancing Precision and Understanding of Aquaculture Farming through Statistical Morphology Analysis and Machine Learning.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Improving Efficiency: Automatic Intelligent Weighing System as a Replacement for Manual Pig Weighing.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- A first meta-analysis study on body weight prediction method for beef cattle based on digital image processing.Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2024Article
- Modeling energy partition patterns of growing pigs fed diets with different net energy levels based on machine learning.Journal of animal science · 2024Article
- Technical note: ShinyAnimalCV: open-source cloud-based web application for object detection, segmentation, and three-dimensional visualization of animals using computer vision.Journal of animal science · 2024Article
- Classification of Daily Body Weight Gains in Beef Calves Using Decision Trees, Artificial Neural Networks, and Logistic Regression.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monitoring, recording, and predicting livestock body weight (BW) allows for timely intervention in diets and health, greater efficiency in genetic selection, and identification of optimal times to market animals because animals that have already reached the point of slaughter represent a burden for the feedlot. There are currently two main approaches (direct and indirect) to measure the BW in livestock. Direct approaches include partial-weight or full-weight industrial scales placed in designated locations on large farms that measure passively or dynamically the weight of livestock. While these devices are very accurate, their acquisition, intended purpose and operation size, repeated calibration and maintenance costs associated with their placement in high-temperature variability, and corrosive environments are significant and beyond the affordability and sustainability limits of small and medium size farms and even of commercial operators. As a more affordable alternative to direct weighing approaches, indirect approaches have been developed based on observed or inferred relationships between biometric and morphometric measurements of livestock and their BW. Initial indirect approaches involved manual measurements of animals using measuring tapes and tubes and the use of regression equations able to correlate such measurements with BW. While such approaches have good BW prediction accuracies, they are time consuming, require trained and skilled farm laborers, and can be stressful for both animals and handlers especially when repeated daily. With the concomitant advancement of contactless electro-optical sensors (e.g., 2D, 3D, infrared cameras), computer vision (CV) technologies, and artificial intelligence fields such as machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), 2D and 3D images have started to be used as biometric and morphometric proxies for BW estimations. This manuscript provides a review of CV-based and ML/DL-based BW prediction methods and discusses their strengths, weaknesses, and industry applicability potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.