Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33626043›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2021

Molecular diagnosis of scabies using a novel probe-based polymerase chain reaction assay targeting high-copy number repetitive sequences in the Sarcoptes scabiei genome.

Lena Chng, Deborah C Holt, Matt Field, Joshua R Francis, Dev Tilakaratne, Milou H Dekkers, Greg Robinson, Kate Mounsey, Rebecca Pavlos, Asha C Bowen and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prevalence and determinants of scabies: A global systematic review and meta-analysis.Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Scabies.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Lena ChngQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
Deborah C HoltMenzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4951-1891
Matt FieldCentre for Tropical Bioinformatics and Molecular Biology and Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Cairns, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0788-6513
Joshua R FrancisMenzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9302-4543
Dev TilakaratneRoyal Darwin Hospital, Tiwi, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9524-2384
Milou H DekkersQueensland Animal Science Precinct, University of Queensland, Gatton, Australia.
Greg RobinsonQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
Kate MounseyUniversity of Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0579-9424
Rebecca PavlosWesfarmers Centre for Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8884-9855
Asha C BowenMenzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3242-1155
Katja FischerQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3408-3337
Anthony T PapenfussThe Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1102-8506
Robin B GasserDepartment of Veterinary Biosciences, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4423-1690
Pasi K KorhonenDepartment of Veterinary Biosciences, Melbourne Veterinary School, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9957-4674
Bart J CurrieMenzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8878-8837
James S McCarthyQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6596-9718
Cielo PasayQIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7424-7303
QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute · AUCharles Darwin University · AUThe Kids Research Institute Australia · AUThe University of Melbourne · AUAustralian National University · AURoyal Darwin Hospital · AUThe University of Queensland · AUUniversity of the Sunshine Coast · AUWalter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe suboptimal sensitivity and specificity of available diagnostic methods for scabies hampers clinical management, trials of new therapies and epidemiologic studies. Additionally, parasitologic diagnosis by microscopic examination of skin scrapings requires sample collection with a sharp scalpel blade, causing discomfort to patients and difficulty in children. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based diagnostic assays, combined with non-invasive sampling methods, represent an attractive approach. In this study, we aimed to develop a real-time probe-based PCR test for scabies, test a non-invasive sampling method and evaluate its diagnostic performance in two clinical settings. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsHigh copy-number repetitive DNA elements were identified in draft Sarcoptes scabiei genome sequences and used as assay targets for diagnostic PCR. Two suitable repetitive DNA sequences, a 375 base pair microsatellite (SSR5) and a 606 base pair long tandem repeat (SSR6), were identified. Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were tested using relevant positive and negative control materials and compared to a published assay targeting the mitochondrial cox1 gene. Both assays were positive at a 1:100 dilution of DNA from a single mite; no amplification was observed in DNA from samples from 19 patients with other skin conditions nor from house dust, sheep or dog mites, head and body lice or from six common skin bacterial and fungal species. Moderate sensitivity of the assays was achieved in a pilot study, detecting 5/7 (71.4% [95% CI: 29.0% - 96.3%]) of clinically diagnosed untreated scabies patients). Greater sensitivity was observed in samples collected by FLOQ swabs compared to skin scrapings. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This newly developed qPCR assay, combined with the use of an alternative non-invasive swab sampling technique offers the possibility of enhanced diagnosis of scabies. Further studies will be required to better define the diagnostic performance of these tests.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsGenomeAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnimalsChildCyclooxygenase 1FemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPilot ProjectsCyclooxygenase 1PTGS1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID33626043
PMCPMC7939366
OpenAlexW3130746834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.