ArticleAnaesthesiology intensive therapy2021
Drug utilisation in adult, paediatric and neonatal intensive care units, with an emphasis on systemic antimicrobials.
Article in Anaesthesiology intensive therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantifying the Silent Selection Pressure: Antimicrobial Stewardship and Gut Microbiome Integrity in the NICU and PICU.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Oropharyngeal Interventions in Intubated Patients for Preventing Ventilator Associated Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Multi-Variate Network Meta-Analysis Evaluating Pharmacological Agents.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Observational
- Unraveling the Role of COMT Polymorphism in Dopamine-Mediated Vasopressor Effects: An Observational Cross-Sectional Study.Current drug metabolism · 2024Observational
- Current knowledge, challenges and innovations in developmental pharmacology: A combined conect4children Expert Group and European Society for Developmental, Perinatal and Paediatric Pharmacology White Paper.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022Review
- Gentamicin in Neonates with Hemodynamically Significant Patent Ductus Arteriosus.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCritically ill adults, children and neonates receive drugs that are often administered parenterally and in infusions. Considering patient illness severity, empirical broad-spectrum antimicrobials are commonly used. We conducted the present study to evaluate the drug use in this population, with a special focus on antimicrobials. MATERIAL AND
methodsA prospective cross-sectional study was implemented in adult, paediatric and neonatal intensive care units. Various prescribing and supplemental indicators were used for drug comparisons. The World Health Organisation's list of essential drugs, the national drug formulary and critically important antimicrobial drugs were assessed. Proportions and median (range) were used to represent categorical and numerical values.
resultsFour hundred and ninety-six critically ill patients were enrolled in the study, with 5,636 prescribed drugs used for 31,993 patient-days. Critically ill adults received significantly more drugs compared to children and the neonatal population (11 [8-16], 9 [6-17] and 5 [3-12] respectively). Critically ill neonates received significantly fewer of the drugs listed in the national formulary compared to older children and adults (94.1% [10.1], 92.4% [32.4] and 80.1% [20.4]). Critically ill neonates received fewer antimicrobials (82% compared to 91.3% in adults and 98% in children). Furthermore, critically ill adults received more broad-spectrum antimicrobials compared to neonates. Prolonged empirical antimicrobial use was observed more in critically ill children (52%) compared to adults (29.8%). A large majority of the antimicrobials were critically important for 87.7%, 83.9% and 86.5% of patients in the adult, paediatric and neonatal intensive care units.
conclusionsWe observed significant differences in terms of drug classes predominantly used in various age groups of critically ill patients, particularly regarding the nature and type of antimicrobial drugs and the duration of antimicrobial therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.