ReviewJournal of cutaneous pathology2021
Primary cutaneous SMARCB1-deficient carcinoma.
Review in Journal of cutaneous pathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Basal cell carcinosarcoma: a systematic review and reappraisal of its challenges and the role of Mohs surgery.Archives of dermatological research · 2023Pooled it
- Pathologist-initiated whole genome and transcriptome sequencing demonstrates diagnostic utility in resolving difficult-to-diagnose tumors.Genome medicine · 2025Article
- SMARCB1 Loss in Poorly Differentiated Chordomas Drives Tumor Progression.The American journal of pathology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSMARCB1-deficient malignancies can arise in various sites. We describe a novel primary SMARCB1-deficient carcinoma of skin (SDCS) and characterize SMARCB1 mutations in non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSC).
methodsCases underwent immunophenotyping and targeted exome sequencing (MSK-IMPACT) assay interrogating somatic mutations in 468 cancer-related genes. The MSK-IMPACT database from 2014 to 2020 encompassing 55, 000 cases was searched for NMSC with SMARCB1 mutations.
resultsSDCS arose on the scalp of an 18-year-old woman showing homozygous SMARCB1 deletion with a LATS2 G963E variant. Another case arose on the temple of a 76-year-old man harboring a SMARCB1 W206* mutation associated with loss of heterozygosity (LOH), 59 concurrent mutations, and a UV mutation signature (UV-MS). Both tumors exhibited INI1 loss, positive CK5/6, p40, p63, and claudin-4 with negative CD34. Of 378 NMSC cases, including 370 carcinomas, 7 SMARCB1-mutated tumors were identified: 3 squamous cell, 3 Merkel cell, and one basal cell carcinoma. Six showed UV-MS. Five INI1-interrogated cases retained protein expression suggesting they were SMARCB1-proficient.
conclusionsSDCS can be clinically aggressive, harbor SMARCB1 homozygous deletions or truncating SMARCB1 mutations associated with LOH, and can occur with or without UV-MS. Overall, SMARCB1 mutations in NMSC are rare with most being of undetermined significance and associated with retained INI1 and UV-MS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.