Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33625650›Full record

ArticleInternational ophthalmology2021

Analysis of factors affecting visual field recovery following surgery for pituitary adenoma.

Su Hwan Park, Min Seung Kang, Sang Yoon Kim, Ji-Eun Lee, Jong Hoon Shin, Heeyoung Choi, Su Jin Kim

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Su Hwan ParkDepartment of Ophthalmology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, 20-Geumo-ro, Mulgeum-eup, Yangsan, Gyeongsangnam-do, 50612, South Korea.
Min Seung KangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, 20-Geumo-ro, Mulgeum-eup, Yangsan, Gyeongsangnam-do, 50612, South Korea.
Sang Yoon KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, 20-Geumo-ro, Mulgeum-eup, Yangsan, Gyeongsangnam-do, 50612, South Korea.
Ji-Eun LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, 20-Geumo-ro, Mulgeum-eup, Yangsan, Gyeongsangnam-do, 50612, South Korea.
Jong Hoon ShinDepartment of Ophthalmology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, 20-Geumo-ro, Mulgeum-eup, Yangsan, Gyeongsangnam-do, 50612, South Korea.
Heeyoung ChoiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea.
Su Jin KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, 20-Geumo-ro, Mulgeum-eup, Yangsan, Gyeongsangnam-do, 50612, South Korea. pearlsj@hanmail.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9693-2993
Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital · KRPusan National University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo analyze the factors influencing visual field recovery in patients with pituitary adenoma following surgical treatment.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 144 eyes of 72 patients with pituitary adenoma who had been followed up for more than 6 months following surgery between January 2016 and December 2019. Pre and postoperative visual acuity, visual field test and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness were investigated. We defined recovery of visual field defects as being an improvement in mean deviation (MD) of 2 dB or more.

resultThe average age of the 72 patients (144 eyes) was 51.94 ± 14.69 years, making for 37 patients in the recovery group and 35 patients in the non-recovery group. Preoperative MD, pattern standard deviation (PSD), and visual field indexes (VFI) were negatively correlated to postoperative MD, PSD and VFI changes and positively correlated to postoperative MD, PSD, and VFI values. Using multiple regression analysis, a shorter duration of symptoms (Odds ratio [OR], 0.990; p = 0.033), higher preoperative MD values (OR, 0.871; p = 0.025), and thicker temporal RNFL (OR, 1.068; p = 0.048) were associated with a visual field recovery following surgery.

conclusionsThe prognosis for visual field recovery is favorable for patients who have a short period from symptom onset to surgery, a higher MD value of preoperative VF, and a thicker peripapillary temporal RNFL thickness. Therefore, the preoperative MD, temporal RNFL thickness, and the symptom period can be predictive variables affecting postoperative visual field recovery.

Indexed as

Pituitary NeoplasmsVisual FieldsAdultAgedHumansMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual Field TestsOptical coherence tomographyPituitary adenomaRetinal nerve fiber layerVisual field

Identifiers

PMID33625650
OpenAlexW3132220751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.