Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33625615›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2021

Real-world evidence from a University Hospital system regarding the uptake of adjuvant pertuzumab and/or neratinib before and after their FDA approval.

Ericson Stoen, Jodi Kagihara, Elena Shagisultanova, Christine M Fisher, Andrew Nicklawsky, Peter Kabos, Virginia F Borges, Jennifer R Diamond

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ericson StoenDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12401 East 17th Avenue, Mailstop F-782, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA. ericson.stoen@cuanschutz.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2121-7543
Jodi KagiharaDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Elena ShagisultanovaDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Christine M FisherDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Andrew NicklawskyDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Peter KabosDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Virginia F BorgesDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Jennifer R DiamondDivision of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
University of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

Cell Immunotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics Program (CIETP).T32CA236734 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Eduardo V Davila, Antonio Jimeno · 2019 to 2026
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA236734
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAdjuvant pertuzumab and neratinib are independently FDA-approved for treatment of early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer in combination with or following trastuzumab for one year, respectively. Both agents reduce the risk of recurrence; however, the absolute benefit is modest for many patients with added risk of adverse effects. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical use of adjuvant pertuzumab and neratinib in patients with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer.

methodsPatients diagnosed with stage I-III HER2-positive breast cancer treated with trastuzumab at four University of Colorado Health hospitals between July 2016 and April 2019 were identified. Patient demographics, cancer stage, treatment, and administration of pertuzumab and/or neratinib were obtained.

resultsWe identified a total of 350 patients who received adjuvant trastuzumab for stage I-III HER2-positive breast cancer; 253 (73.1%) had tumors that were ≥ T2 or node-positive disease. The rate of adjuvant pertuzumab use increased following FDA approval; pertuzumab was administered to the majority of patients with node-positive HER2-positive breast cancer. The use of adjuvant pertuzumab was associated with younger age, premenopausal status, and node-positive disease. Rates of administration of adjuvant neratinib were lower, with only 15.2% of patients receiving this therapy within 3 months of completing adjuvant trastuzumab.

conclusionIn our cohort of patients treated within a diverse healthcare network, the majority of patients with node-positive HER2-positive breast cancer received adjuvant pertuzumab following FDA approval. The use of adjuvant neratinib was less common, potentially as a result of adverse effects, prolongation of therapy, previous administration of adjuvant pertuzumab, and modest benefit.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsFemaleHospitals, UniversityHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalQuinolinesTrastuzumabAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesneratinibpertuzumabQuinolinesTrastuzumabAdjuvant therapyBreast cancerHER2NeratinibPertuzumab

Identifiers

PMID33625615
PMCPMC8197701
OpenAlexW3129545728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.