ArticleJAMA network open2021
Assessment and Management of Cardiovascular Risk Factors Among US Veterans With Prostate Cancer.
Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular disease risk with degarelix and GnRH agonists in prostate cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025Pooled it
- Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Intensive Systolic Blood Pressure Control in Patients With Renal Cell or Thyroid Cancer Receiving VEGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: ECOG-ACRIN EAQ191.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2026Trial
- Leptin levels are associated with coronary artery calcification in patients with advanced prostate cancer.The oncologist · 2025Trial
- Cardiovascular Safety of Degarelix Versus Leuprolide in Patients With Prostate Cancer: The Primary Results of the PRONOUNCE Randomized Trial.Circulation · 2021Trial
- Nonprostate Cancer Deaths Best Predict Long-Term Survival in Men Aged ≤59 Years Treated With Low Dose Rate Brachytherapy With or Without Supplemental Therapies: A Mandate for Health Enhancement.Advances in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Specialist Referral for Cardiovascular Risk in Patients With Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA internal medicine · 2026Article
- Metabolic Dysfunction After Initiation of Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitors in Prostate Cancer.JAMA oncology · 2026Article
- Medical Management of Modifiable Risks: Improving Survival in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients Receiving Brachytherapy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Cardiovascular risks in men with prostate cancer: a pragmatic, clinician-oriented review of risk stratification and management strategies.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Review
- Long-term prostate cancer survival outcomes including patterns of death in men >=75 years of age treated with low dose rate brachytherapy.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Associations of SGLT2i with Cardiorenal Outcomes Among Diabetics with Prostate Cancer on Hormone Therapy.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2025Observational
- Associations of SGLT2i with Cardiorenal Outcomes Among Diabetics with Prostate Cancer on Hormone Therapy.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2025Observational
- Comprehensive review of cardiovascular disease in prostate cancer: epidemiology, risk factors, therapeutics and prevention strategies.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2025Review
- The need for precision medicine in managing cardiovascular risk for men receiving ADT.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2025Article
- Taiwan Consensus for the Management of Cardiovascular Risks and Complications in Patients with Prostate Cancer.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2025Article
- Addressing cardiovascular risks with a goal to prevent cardiovascular complications in patients undergoing antihormonal therapy for prostate cancer.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Principles of optimal multidisciplinary management of prostate cancer in clinical practice.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Major adverse cardiovascular events among Black and White Veterans receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: a retrospective cohort study.Cardio-oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Atherosclerosis and the Bidirectional Relationship Between Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease: From Bench to Bedside, Part 2 Management.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Cardiovascular Risk in Prostate Cancer:JACC. CardioOncology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of mortality in patients with prostate cancer, and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) may worsen cardiovascular risk. Adherence to guideline-recommended assessment and management of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) in patients initiating ADT is unknown. Objective: To describe CVRF assessment and management in men with prostate cancer initiating ADT and overall. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cross-sectional analysis of 90 494 men treated within the US Veterans Health Administration diagnosed with prostate cancer between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2017, was conducted. Participants included men with a history of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), and treatment with ADT within 1 year of diagnosis. Data analysis was conducted from September 10, 2019, to July 1, 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: Rates of comprehensive CVRF assessment, uncontrolled CVRFs, and untreated CVRFs. Comprehensive CVRF assessment was defined as recorded measures for blood pressure, cholesterol, and glucose levels; CVRF control as blood pressure lower than 140/90 mm Hg, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol 130 mg/dL, and hemoglobin A1c less than 7%; and CVRF treatment as receipt of cardiac risk-reducing medications. Multivariable risk difference regression assessed the association between ASCVD and initiation of ADT and these outcomes. Results: Of 90 494 veterans, median age was 66 years (interquartile range, 62-70 years); and 22 700 men (25.1%) received ADT. Overall, 68.1% (95% CI, 67.8%-68.3%) of the men received comprehensive CVRF assessment; 54.1% (95% CI. 53.7%-54.4%) of those assessed had uncontrolled CVRFs, and 29.6% (95% CI, 29.2%-30.0%) of those with uncontrolled CVRFs were not receiving corresponding cardiac risk-reducing medication. Compared with the reference group of patients without ASCVD not receiving ADT, patients with ASCVD not receiving ADT had a 10.4% (95% CI, 9.5%-11.3%) higher probability of comprehensive CVRF assessment, 4.0% (95% CI, 2.9%-5.1%) lower risk of uncontrolled CVRFs, and 22.2% (95% CI, 21.1%-23.3%) lower risk of untreated CVRFs. Similar differences were observed in patients with ASCVD receiving ADT. In contrast, patients without ASCVD receiving ADT had only a 3.0% (95% CI, 2.1%-3.9%) higher probability of comprehensive CVRF assessment, 2.6% (95% CI, 1.6%-3.5%) higher risk of uncontrolled CVRFs, and 5.4% (95% CI, 4.2%-6.6%) lower risk of untreated CVRFs. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that veterans with prostate cancer had a high rate of underassessed and undertreated CVRFs, and ADT initiation was not associated with substantial improvements in CVRF assessment or management. These findings highlight gaps in care and the need for interventions to improve CVRF mitigation in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.