Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33625463›Full record

Observational studyJAMA internal medicine2021

Association of SARS-CoV-2 Seropositive Antibody Test With Risk of Future Infection.

Raymond A Harvey, Jeremy A Rassen, Carly A Kabelac, Wendy Turenne, Sandy Leonard, Reyna Klesh, William A Meyer, Harvey W Kaufman, Steve Anderson, Oren Cohen and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA internal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 167 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
167citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
18.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

167 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 286 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Immunogenicity and safety of AZD1222 (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) against SARS-CoV-2 in Japan: a double-blind, randomized controlled phase 1/2 trial.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Reinfection and post-vaccination infection by SARS-CoV-2 in nursing professionals: a prospective cohort study, Recife, 2020-2023.Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. PostCOVID-19 Impact on Perinatal Outcomes.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational

107 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Raymond A HarveyAetion, Inc, New York, New York.
Jeremy A RassenAetion, Inc, New York, New York.
Carly A KabelacAetion, Inc, New York, New York.
Wendy TurenneAetion, Inc, New York, New York.
Sandy LeonardHealthVerity, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Reyna KleshHealthVerity, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
William A MeyerQuest Diagnostics, Secaucus, New Jersey.
Harvey W Kaufman
Steve AndersonLabCorp, Burlington, North Carolina.
Oren CohenLabCorp, Burlington, North Carolina.
Valentina I PetkovNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Kathy A CroninNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Alison L Van DykeNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Douglas R LowyNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Norman E SharplessNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Lynne T PenberthyNational Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Aetion (United States) · USNational Cancer Institute · USNational Institutes of Health · USLabCorp (United States) · USQuest Diagnostics (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Understanding the effect of serum antibodies to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) on susceptibility to infection is important for identifying at-risk populations and could have implications for vaccine deployment. Objective: The study purpose was to evaluate evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection based on diagnostic nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) among patients with positive vs negative test results for antibodies in an observational descriptive cohort study of clinical laboratory and linked claims data. Design, Setting, and Participants: The study created cohorts from a deidentified data set composed of commercial laboratory tests, medical and pharmacy claims, electronic health records, and hospital chargemaster data. Patients were categorized as antibody-positive or antibody-negative according to their first SARS-CoV-2 antibody test in the database. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary end points were post-index diagnostic NAAT results, with infection defined as a positive diagnostic test post-index, measured in 30-day intervals (0-30, 31-60, 61-90, >90 days). Additional measures included demographic, geographic, and clinical characteristics at the time of the index antibody test, including recorded signs and symptoms or prior evidence of coronavirus 2019 (COVID) diagnoses or positive NAAT results and recorded comorbidities. Results: The cohort included 3 257 478 unique patients with an index antibody test; 56% were female with a median (SD) age of 48 (20) years. Of these, 2 876 773 (88.3%) had a negative index antibody result, and 378 606 (11.6%) had a positive index antibody result. Patients with a negative antibody test result were older than those with a positive result (mean age 48 vs 44 years). Of index-positive patients, 18.4% converted to seronegative over the follow-up period. During the follow-up periods, the ratio (95% CI) of positive NAAT results among individuals who had a positive antibody test at index vs those with a negative antibody test at index was 2.85 (95% CI, 2.73-2.97) at 0 to 30 days, 0.67 (95% CI, 0.6-0.74) at 31 to 60 days, 0.29 (95% CI, 0.24-0.35) at 61 to 90 days, and 0.10 (95% CI, 0.05-0.19) at more than 90 days. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, patients with positive antibody test results were initially more likely to have positive NAAT results, consistent with prolonged RNA shedding, but became markedly less likely to have positive NAAT results over time, suggesting that seropositivity is associated with protection from infection. The duration of protection is unknown, and protection may wane over time.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 Nucleic Acid TestingCOVID-19 Serological TestingDisease SusceptibilitySARS-CoV-2AdultAge FactorsAntibodies, ViralCorrelation of DataFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSeroepidemiologic StudiesSymptom AssessmentUnited StatesAntibodies, Viral

Identifiers

PMID33625463
PMCPMC7905701
OpenAlexW3132798068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.