Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33625365›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2021

Effects of the Active Choices Program on Self-Managed Physical Activity and Social Connectedness in Australian Defence Force Veterans: Protocol for a Cluster-Randomized Trial.

Nicholas D Gilson, Zoe E Papinczak, Gregore Iven Mielke, Catherine Haslam, Jonas Fooken, Jim McKenna, Wendy J Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nicholas D GilsonSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5744-3609
Zoe E PapinczakSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2386-5651
Gregore Iven MielkeSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3043-2715
Catherine HaslamSchool of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0124-9601
Jonas FookenCentre for the Business and Economics of Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5402-9202
Jim McKennaActive Lifestyles Research Centre, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6779-3939
Wendy J BrownSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9093-4509

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA stepped-down program is one in which clients transition from the care of a health professional to self-managed care. Very little is known about the effectiveness of stepped-down physical activity (PA) programs for military service veterans.

objectiveThis study will test Active Choices, a stepped-down behavioral support program designed to help Australian Defence Force veterans and their dependents who are clients of the Department of Veterans' Affairs, transition from treatment by an exercise physiologist or physiotherapist to self-managed PA.

methodsThe study is a parallel-group, randomized trial, with city-based exercise physiology or physiotherapy practices that recruit eligible Department of Veterans' Affairs clients assigned to Active Choices or a comparison program. The study aims to recruit 52 participants (26 in each group). The Active Choices program will consist of 2 face-to-face (Weeks 1, 12) and 2 telephone (Weeks 4 and 8) consultations. During these sessions, the participant and Active Choices consultant will utilize an evidence-based resource booklet to review the key benefits of an active lifestyle, build an action plan for PA preferences, set and review goals, self-monitor progress relative to set goals, and discuss strategies to overcome PA barriers. Linking participants to local PA communities to overcome social isolation will be a program priority. The comparison program will consist of 2 consultations (Weeks 1 and 12) and use fewer behavioral support strategies (education, self-monitoring, and action planning only) than Active Choices. Outcome measures will be administered at baseline, end-intervention (12 weeks), and follow-up (24 weeks) to assess changes in moderate intensity self-managed PA, psychological well-being, and social connectedness. We will also measure health service utilization and costs as well as PA choices across the intervention period. End-intervention interviews will capture participant experiences.

resultsDue to the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on human research activities in Australia, participant recruitment will commence when it is safe and feasible to do so.

conclusionsFindings will provide valuable pilot data to support up-scaling of the program and larger effectiveness trials with regional and rural as well as city-based Australian Defence Force veterans and their dependents.

trial registrationAustralian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN12620000559910; https://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12620000559910.aspx. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/21911.

Indexed as

behavioralbehavioral support programhealth professionalhealth service costshealth service utilizationmilitary service veteransphysical activitypsychological well-beingself-managed physical activitysocial connectednesssupport programveteranswell-being

Identifiers

PMID33625365
PMCPMC7946582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.