Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33624892›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastroenterology and hepatology2021

Advancing care for acute gastrointestinal bleeding using artificial intelligence.

Dennis L Shung

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dennis L ShungYale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8226-1842
Yale University · US

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM IN INVESTIGATIVE GASTROENTEROLOGYT32DK007017 · NIDDK · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Fred Sanford Gorelick, Liza Konnikova · 1986 to 2026
$7.1M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007017NIH HHS T32 DK007017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The future of gastrointestinal bleeding will include the integration of machine learning algorithms to enhance clinician risk assessment and decision making. Machine learning algorithms have shown promise in outperforming existing clinical risk scores for both upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding but have not been validated in any prospective clinical trials. The adoption of electronic health records provides an exciting opportunity to deploy risk prediction tools in real time and also to expand the data available to train predictive models. Machine learning algorithms can be used to identify patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding using data extracted from the electronic health record. This can lead to an automated process to find patients with symptoms of acute gastrointestinal bleeding so that risk prediction tools can be then triggered to consistently provide decision support to the physician. Neural network models can be used to provide continuous risk predictions for patients who are at higher risk, which can be used to guide triage of patients to appropriate levels of care. Finally, the future will likely include neural network-based analysis of endoscopic stigmata of bleeding to help guide best practices for hemostasis during the endoscopic procedure. Machine learning will enhance the delivery of care at every level for patients with acute gastrointestinal bleeding through identifying very low risk patients for outpatient management, triaging high risk patients for higher levels of care, and guiding optimal intervention during endoscopy.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAcute DiseaseDecision MakingDelivery of Health CareElectronic Health RecordsEndoscopy, GastrointestinalGastrointestinal HemorrhageHemostasisHumansNeural Networks, ComputerOutpatientsRiskRisk AssessmentTriageartificial intelligencegastrointestinal hemorrhagemachine learningnatural language processingrisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID33624892
PMCPMC11874509
OpenAlexW3130627944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.