Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33624872›Full record

ArticleSuicide & life-threatening behavior2021

A network perspective on suicidal behavior: Understanding suicidality as a complex system.

Derek de Beurs, Claudi Bockting, Ad Kerkhof, Floortje Scheepers, Rory O'Connor, Brenda Penninx, Ingrid van de Leemput

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Suicide & life-threatening behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Do the Relative Importance and Pattern of Correlates of Suicidal Ideation Vary by Age and Gender? Network Analyses.International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Symptomatic networks in suicide attempt and reattempt: Relevance of psychiatric comorbidity.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Derek de BeursTrimbos Institute (Netherlands Institute of Mental Health), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Claudi BocktingDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam University Medical Centers (location AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ad KerkhofDepartment of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Floortje ScheepersDepartement of Psychiatry, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Rory O'ConnorSuicidal Behaviour Research Laboratory, Glasgow University, Glasgow, UK.
Brenda PenninxDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ingrid van de LeemputDepartment of Aquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuicidal behavior is the result of complex interactions between many different factors that change over time. A network perspective may improve our understanding of these complex dynamics. Within the network perspective, psychopathology is considered to be a consequence of symptoms that directly interact with one another in a network structure. To view suicidal behavior as the result of such a complex system is a good starting point to facilitate moving away from traditional linear thinking.

objectiveTo review the existing paradigms and theories and their application to suicidal behavior.

methodsIn the first part of this paper, we introduce the relevant concepts within network analysis such as network density and centrality. Where possible, we refer to studies that have applied these concepts within the field of suicide prevention. In the second part, we move one step further, by understanding the network perspective as an initial step toward complex system theory. The latter is a branch of science that models interacting variables in order to understand the dynamics of complex systems, such as tipping points and hysteresis.

resultsFew studies have applied network analysis to study suicidal behavior. The studies that do highlight the complexity of suicidality. Complexity science offers potential useful concepts such as alternative stable states and resilience to study psychopathology and suicidal behavior, as demonstrated within the field of depression. To date, one innovative study has applied concepts from complexity science to better understand suicidal behavior. Complexity science and its application to human behavior are in its infancy, and it requires more collaboration between complexity scientists and behavioral scientists.

conclusionsClinicians and scientists are increasingly conceptualizing suicidal behavior as the result of the complex interaction between many different biological, social, and psychological risk and protective factors. Novel statistical techniques such as network analysis can help the field to better understand this complexity. The application of concepts from complexity science to the field of psychopathology and suicide research offers exciting and promising possibilities for our understanding and prevention of suicide.

Indexed as

Suicidal IdeationSuicide PreventionHumansPsychopathologyRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID33624872
PMCPMC7986393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.