Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33624454›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2021

Comparative prognostic value of different preoperative complete blood count cell ratios in patients with oral cavity cancer treated with surgery and postoperative radiotherapy.

Yao-Yu Wu, Kai-Ping Chang, Tsung-Ying Ho, Wen-Chi Chou, Sheng-Ping Hung, Kang-Hsing Fan, Yin-Yin Chiang, Yung-Chih Chou, Ngan-Ming Tsang

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Platelet Lymphocyte Ratio as a Prognosticator in Oral Cancer Patients.Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yao-Yu WuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-6491-7059
Kai-Ping ChangDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-1777-9578
Tsung-Ying HoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Center, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
Wen-Chi ChouDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-0361-4548
Sheng-Ping HungDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
Kang-Hsing FanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
Yin-Yin ChiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
Yung-Chih ChouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-1723-2313
Ngan-Ming TsangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-5416-0961

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe sought to compare the prognostic significance of different preoperative complete blood count cell ratios in patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) treated with surgery and postoperative radiotherapy (PORT).

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 890 patients with OSCC who were treated with surgery and PORT. The following preoperative complete blood count cell ratios were collected: neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR). Overall survival (OS), local control, regional control, and distant control (DC) served as the main outcomes of interest.

resultsThe results of multivariate analysis in the entire study cohort revealed that a low NLR was the only independently favorable marker of both OS (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 0.794, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.656-0.961, bootstrap p = 0.028) and DC (adjusted HR: 0.659, 95% CI: 0.478-0.909, bootstrap p = 0.015). Both LMR and PLR were not retained in the model as independent predictors. Subgroup analyses in high-risk patients (i.e., those bearing T4 disease, N3 disease, or poor differentiation) revealed that a high NLR was a significant adverse risk factor for both OS and DC (all p < 0.03)-with a borderline significance being evident for DC in patients with T4 disease (p = 0.058).

conclusionsA high pretreatment NLR was an independent unfavorable risk factor for both OS and DC in patients with OSCC who underwent surgery and PORT. No other preoperative complete blood count parameters and cell ratios were found to have prognostic significance.

Indexed as

Blood Cell CountAdultBlood PlateletsCarcinoma, Squamous CellConfidence IntervalsFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLymphocytesMaleMiddle AgedMonocytesMouth NeoplasmsMultivariate AnalysisNeutrophilsPreoperative Caredistant metastasislymphocyte-to-monocyte rationeutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratiooral cavity squamous cell carcinomaoverall survivalplatelet-to-lymphocyte ratio

Identifiers

PMID33624454
PMCPMC7957172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.