Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33624444›Full record

SynthesisCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2021

HPV and lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Julia Karnosky, Wolfgang Dietmaier, Helge Knuettel, Viola Freigang, Myriam Koch, Franziska Koll, Florian Zeman, Christian Schulz

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Julia KarnoskyKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Bereich Pneumologie, Klinikum der Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Wolfgang DietmaierInstitut für Pathologie, Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Helge KnuettelUniversitätsbibliothek, Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Viola FreigangKlinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Klinikum der Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Myriam KochKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Bereich Pneumologie, Klinikum der Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Franziska KollKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Bereich Pneumologie, Klinikum der Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Florian ZemanZentrum für Klinische Studien, Klinikum der Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Christian SchulzKlinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Bereich Pneumologie, Klinikum der Universität Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4861-4517
University Hospital Regensburg · DEThüringer Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek · DEUniversity of Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLung cancer has emerged as a global public health problem and is the most common cause of cancer deaths by absolute cases globally. Besides tobacco, smoke infectious diseases such as human papillomavirus (HPV) might be involved in the pathogenesis of lung cancer. However, data are inconsistent due to differences in study design and HPV detection methods.

aimA systematic meta-analysis was performed to examine the presence of HPV-infection with lung cancer. METHODS AND

resultsAll studies in all languages were considered for the search concepts "lung cancer" and "HPV" if data specific to HPV prevalence in lung cancer tissue were given. This included Journal articles as well as abstracts and conference reports. As detection method, only HPV PCR results from fresh frozen and paraffin-embedded tissue were included. Five bibliographic databases and three registers of clinical trials including MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched through February 2020. A total 4298 publications were identified, and 78 publications were selected, resulting in 9385 included lung cancer patients. A meta-analysis of 15 case-control studies with n = 2504 patients showed a weighted overall prevalence difference of 22% (95% CI: 12%-33%; P < .001) and a weighted overall 4.7-fold (95% CI: 2.7-8.4; P < .001) increase of HPV prevalence in lung cancer patients compared to controls. Overall, HPV prevalence amounted to 13.5% being highest in Asia (16.6%), followed by America (12.8%), and Europe (7.0%). A higher HPV prevalence was found in squamous cell carcinoma (17.9%) compared to adenocarcinoma (P < .01) with significant differences in geographic patterns. HPV genotypes 16 and 18 were the most prevalent high-risk genotypes identified.

conclusionIn conclusion, our review provides convincing evidence that HPV infection increases the risk of developing lung cancer.

Indexed as

Adenocarcinoma of LungAlphapapillomavirusCarcinoma, Squamous CellCase-Control StudiesHumansLungLung NeoplasmsPapillomavirus InfectionsPrevalencecarcinogenesisHPVlung cancermeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID33624444
PMCPMC8388180
OpenAlexW3132366378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.