Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33624232›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2021

Noninvasive brain stimulation to lateral prefrontal cortex alters the novelty of creative idea generation.

Yoed N Kenett, David S Rosen, Emilio R Tamez, Sharon L Thompson-Schill

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yoed N KenettDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. yoedk@technion.ac.il.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3872-7689
David S RosenDepartment of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1961-6609
Emilio R TamezDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Sharon L Thompson-SchillDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9750-4306
University of Pennsylvania · USDrexel University · USTechnion – Israel Institute of Technology · IL

Funding

Linguistic and NonLinguistic Functions of Frontal CortexR01DC009209 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI THOMPSONSCHILL, SHARON L · 2008 to 2018
$5.2M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009209
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theories of the processes involved in creative cognition posit that cognitive control has a negative effect on creative idea generation but a positive effect on creative idea evaluation. Brain stimulation research has started to examine empirically the effects of cognitive control, with several reports of decreased cognitive control facilitating creative ideation. Such studies have shown how decreased cognitive control mechanisms facilitate creative idea generation, potentially by allowing participants access to less inhibited weaker-related associations, thereby increasing novelty. In the current study, we advance this line of work by investigating how cognitive control affects creative thinking, potentially inhibiting or facilitating novel idea generation based on task demands. Participants read sentences with the final word missing and were instructed to complete the sentence with an uncommon (but appropriate) ending. Participants performed this task while undergoing either anodal (excitatory), cathodal (inhibitory), or sham (control) transcranial direct current stimulation over their left prefrontal cortex. These responses were then rated for their novelty and appropriateness by an independent sample of raters. We found that anodal stimulation increased the appropriateness and decreased the novelty of participants' responses. Contrary to previous studies, we did not find that cathodal stimulation increased the novelty of participants' responses, which may be due to the nature of our task. Overall, we demonstrate how cognitive control mechanisms may inhibit novel idea generation.

Indexed as

Transcranial Direct Current StimulationCognitionCreativityHumansPrefrontal CortexThinkingCognitive controlCreativityLSAtDCS

Identifiers

PMID33624232
PMCPMC8122037
OpenAlexW3133287773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.