Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33624185›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2021

Predictors of Microvascular Reperfusion After Myocardial Infarction.

Daniel J Doherty, Robert Sykes, Kenneth Mangion, Colin Berry

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel J DohertyWest of Scotland Regional Heart and Lung Centre, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6492-5817
Robert SykesWest of Scotland Regional Heart and Lung Centre, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1010-5474
Kenneth MangionWest of Scotland Regional Heart and Lung Centre, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3505-7440
Colin BerryWest of Scotland Regional Heart and Lung Centre, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, UK. colin.berry@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-4547-8636
Golden Jubilee National Hospital · GBNHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation RE/18/6134217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewIn acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), successful restoration of blood flow in the infarct-related coronary artery may not secure effective myocardial reperfusion. The mortality and morbidity associated with acute MI remain significant. Microvascular obstruction (MVO) represents failed microvascular reperfusion. MVO is under-recognized, independently associated with adverse cardiac prognosis and represents an unmet therapeutic need. RECENT

findingsMultiple factors including clinical presentation, patient characteristics, biochemical markers, and imaging parameters are associated with MVO after MI. Impaired microvascular reperfusion is common following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). New knowledge about disease mechanisms underpins precision medicine with individualized risk assessment, investigation, and stratified therapy. To date, there are no evidence-based therapies to prevent or treat MVO post-MI. Identifying novel therapy for MVO is the next frontier.

Indexed as

Myocardial InfarctionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionCoronary AngiographyCoronary CirculationHumansMicrocirculationMicrovascular obstructionMRIMyocardial infarctionStratified medicine

Identifiers

PMID33624185
PMCPMC7902326
OpenAlexW3130785573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.