ArticleArchives of osteoporosis2021
Hip fractures in Spain: are we on the right track? Statistically significant differences in hip fracture management between Autonomous Communities in Spain.
Article in Archives of osteoporosis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- The 24-Hour Window: How Time to Admission Reshapes the Impact of Surgical Delay on Mortality in Elderly Hip Fracture.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- In-Hospital Mortality Among 40,253 Older Adults with Hip Fracture: Survival Outcomes and Multivariate Analysis in a Chilean Cohort.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Differences in health outcomes for high-need high-cost patients across high-income countries.Health services research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although medicine is currently protocol-based, there are still differences in the management of the hip fracture in Spain, especially regarding surgical delay, type of anesthesia, early mobilization, and discharge destinations. This data will be of great value to assist stakeholders in formulating health policies. PURPOSE: Analysis of demographic, clinical, surgical, and functional data of the Spanish National Hip Fracture National Registry (RNFC), during admission and at 1-month follow-up, by Autonomous Communities (ACs).
methodsCross-sectional analysis in the framework of a RNFC cohort, from January 2017 to May 2018, including 15 ACs from Spain, with 1 month of follow-up. Sociodemographic, clinical, surgical, and outcome variables were analyzed.
resultsIn total, 13,839 patients were analyzed. There were significant differences (p <0.001) in median surgical delay and percentage of patients operated in less than 48 h. Mean surgical delay was 70.75 h, with a 12-h difference between the Communities of Madrid (71.22) and Catalonia (59.65). Only 43% of patients had less than 48-h delay. Overall, most patients received regional anesthesia (91.9%); however, there was a significant difference between ACs (p = 0.0001). There were also differences in inpatient stay, early mobilization, discharge destination, and mortality (p <0.001). Mortality 30 days after surgery was 7.8%, and highest in the Basque Country (12.5%).
conclusionsThe registry showed homogeneity among ACs regarding sociodemographic variables, fracture type, surgical treatment, ASA risk, and co-management with a geriatrician or an integrated internist. There were significant differences in hip fracture management between ACs in Spain, especially regarding surgical delay, type of anesthesia, early mobilization, and discharge destinations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.