Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33624147›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2021

Antibodies elicited by the CaniLeish® vaccine: long-term clinical follow-up study of dogs in Spain.

A Montoya, R Checa, V Marino, R Gálvez, M Portero, K De Mari, C Navarro, G Miró

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

A MontoyaAnimal Health Department, Veterinary Faculty, UCM, Madrid, Spain. amontoya@ucm.es.
R ChecaAnimal Health Department, Veterinary Faculty, UCM, Madrid, Spain.
V MarinoAnimal Health Department, Veterinary Faculty, UCM, Madrid, Spain.
R GálvezAnimal Health Department, Veterinary Faculty, UCM, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9247-3136
M PorteroVeterinary Teaching Hospital, Veterinary Faculty, UCM, Madrid, Spain.
K De MariMedical Department, Virbac, 06511, Carros, France.
C NavarroMedical Department, Virbac, 06511, Carros, France.
G MiróAnimal Health Department, Veterinary Faculty, UCM, Madrid, Spain. gmiro@ucm.es.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0981-2470
Department of Animal Health · VNVirbac (France) · FRUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevention of canine leishmaniosis in healthy dogs requires a multimodal approach combining repellents with an effective vaccine. A vaccine that modulates the cell-mediated immune response against the protozoan has been available in Europe since 2012 (CaniLeish®, Virbac, France). The aim of the present study was to monitor dogs vaccinated with CaniLeish® to examine the kinetics of the antibody response and the safety and tolerance of CaniLeish®. Dogs vaccinated with CaniLeish® were monitored for 12 months. In follow-up visits at baseline (primovaccination or annual booster) (Visit 1, V1), and 1 (V2), 4 (V3), 8 (V4) and 12 (V5) months later, we examined antibody response kinetics using two serology techniques (IFAT and Speed Leish K™). Tolerance to CaniLeish® and its safety were also monitored. Anti-L. infantum IgG antibodies were determined in 242 dogs (125 dogs after primovaccination (Group P) and 117 dogs after booster vaccination (Group B). In addition, 46, 22 and 19 dogs were followed for 2, 3 and 4 years, respectively. At baseline, 100% of dogs in Group P returned negative IFAT and Speed Leish K™ test results while 9.4% (11/117) in Group B tested IFAT positive though Speed Leish K™ negative. In subsequent visits, seropositivity was detected by IFAT in 31.2% (Group P) and 41% (Group B) of the dogs in V2; 16.8% (Group P) and 10.2% (Group B) in V3; 6.4% (Group P) and 8.5% (Group B) in V4; and 3.2% (Group P) and 5.9% (Group B) in V5. All dogs tested Speed Leish K™ negative except two, in which it was later confirmed by molecular testing that they were not infected. Adverse events that could be associated with the vaccine were detected in 20 out of 314 dogs (6.4%). The good clinical status of all dogs was confirmed in an exhaustive clinical exam and haemato-biochemical profile. The Canileish® vaccine was well-tolerated with exceptions that did not appear to be related to age, sex, race or size of vaccinated dogs. Anti-L. infantum antibodies were detected by IFAT in 31.9-40.3% of the dogs 1 month after vaccination, and these antibodies could still be detected in 3.2% of the dogs 1 year later. This means that veterinarians need to use other tools (eg. PCR) to correctly diagnose seropositive dogs.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanDog DiseasesDogsFemaleFluorescent Antibody Technique, IndirectFollow-Up StudiesLeishmania infantumLeishmaniasis, VisceralMalePolymerase Chain ReactionProtozoan VaccinesSpainVaccinationAntibodies, ProtozoanProtozoan VaccinesAntibodiesCaniLeish®Canine leishmaniosisDogLeishmania infantumVaccine

Identifiers

PMID33624147
OpenAlexW3132913556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.