Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33624145›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2021

Sero-epidemiology of porcine parvovirus, circovirus, and classical swine fever virus infections in India.

Dipak Deka, Nagendra Nath Barman, Nipu Deka, Balwinder Kaur Batth, Gagandeep Singh, Sarabjot Singh, Ravi Kant Agrawal, Chandra Sekhar Mukhopadhyay, Ramneek

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Dipak DekaCollege of Animal Biotechnology, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India. deepakdeka@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5640-2920
Nagendra Nath BarmanDepartment of Microbiology, College of Veterinary Science, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati, Assam, India.
Nipu DekaICAR-AICRP on pig, Assam Agricultural University, Khanapara, Guwahati, Assam, India.
Balwinder Kaur Batth, Ludhiana, India.
Gagandeep SinghAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Sarabjot SinghSchool of Public Health and Zoonoses, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Ravi Kant AgrawalLivestock Products Technology Division, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, Barielly, Uttar Pradesh (UP), India.
Chandra Sekhar MukhopadhyayCollege of Animal Biotechnology, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
RamneekCollege of Animal Biotechnology, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University · INAssam Agricultural University · INAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USIndian Veterinary Research Institute · INPublic Works Department Buildings and Roads · IN

Funding

Department of Biotechnology, Government of India, New Delhi BT/CP/16/NE/TBP/2010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reproductive problems in swine caused by porcine viruses pose a serious threat to the pig industry in developing countries like India. For evaluating the true extent of porcine infections, a total of 1308 representative sera samples were collected from 92 different pig farms covering 8 North-Eastern states and Punjab state of Northern India during a period of 2 years (2011-2013). Sera samples were tested for the presence of antibodies against porcine parvovirus (PPV), porcine circovirus-2 (PCV-2), and classical swine fever virus (CSFV) using commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits. In the North-Eastern states, the seroprevalence of CSFV in non-vaccinated animals was 6.30% and that of PCV2 and PPV was 6.28% and 1.24%, respectively. In Punjab, the seroprevalence of CSFV in non-vaccinated animals was 44.44% and seroprevalence of PCV-2 and PPV was 34.07% and 39.10%, respectively. Detection of antibodies against more than one virus revealed that 4.66% animals had co-infection with PCV-2 and PPV, 1.75% with CSF and PPV, 1.98% with CSF and PCV-2, and 1.75% with all the three viruses. The receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curve analysis depicted that piglet mortality, parvovirus, and CSFV were the most important parameters with an AUC value of 0.997, 0.897, and 0.973, respectively. Incidence of single or co-infection with different viruses showed that the occurrence of single infection was significantly more prevalent than co-infection. This study provides useful information to set up future epidemiologic, flock management, and public animal health policies for the prevention and control of PCV-2, PPV, and CSF in India.

Indexed as

Circoviridae InfectionsCircovirusClassical Swine Fever VirusParvovirus, PorcineSwine DiseasesAnimalsIndiaSeroepidemiologic StudiesSwineCSFVELISAInfectionPCV-2PPVReproductive failure

Identifiers

PMID33624145
OpenAlexW3131821299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.