Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33624121›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2021

In silico comparison of pharmacokinetic properties of three extended half-life factor IX concentrates.

Tim Preijers, Laura Bukkems, Max van Spengler, Frank Leebeek, Marjon Cnossen, Ron Mathôt

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Extended Half-Life Factor Concentrates in Haemophilia Treatment.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tim PreijersHospital Pharmacy-Clinical Pharmacology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Laura BukkemsHospital Pharmacy-Clinical Pharmacology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Max van SpenglerHospital Pharmacy-Clinical Pharmacology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Frank LeebeekDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Marjon CnossenDepartment of Pediatric Hematology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Ron MathôtHospital Pharmacy-Clinical Pharmacology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, P.O. Box 22660, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, Netherlands. r.mathot@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8401-0879
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLErasmus MC · NLErasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePharmacokinetic (PK) differences between the extended half-life (EHL) factor IX (FIX) concentrates for hemophilia B exist, which may influence hemostatic efficacy of replacement therapy in patients. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the PK properties of three EHL-FIX concentrates and compare them to a standard half-life (SHL) recombinant FIX (rFIX) concentrate.

methodsActivity-time profiles of PEGylated FIX (N9-GP), FIX linked with human albumin (rIX-FP), FIX coupled to human IgG1 Fc-domain (rFIXFc), and SHL rFIX were simulated for 10,000 patients during steady-state dosing of 40 IU/kg once weekly (EHL-FIX) and biweekly (rFIX) using published concentrate specific population PK models.

resultsHalf-lives were respectively 80, 104, and 82 h for N9-GP, rIX-FP, and rFIXFc versus 22 h for rFIX. Between the EHL concentrates, exposure was different with area under the curve (AUC) values of 78.5, 49.6, and 12.1 IU/h/mL and time above FIX target values of 0.10 IU/mL of 168, 168, and 36 h for N9-GP, rIX-FP, and rFIXFc, respectively. N9-GP produced the highest median in vivo recovery value (1.70 IU/dL per IU/kg) compared with 1.18, 1.00, and 1.05 IU/dL per IU/kg for rIX-FP, rFIXFc, and rFIX, respectively.

conclusionsWhen comparing EHL products, not only half-life but also exposure must be considered. In addition, variation in extravascular distribution of the FIX concentrates must be taken into account. This study provides insight into the different PK properties of these concentrates and may aid in determination of dosing regimens of EHL-FIX concentrates in real-life.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge FactorsBody WeightDelayed-Action PreparationsFactor IXHalf-LifeHemophilia BHumansMetabolic Clearance RateMiddle AgedMonte Carlo MethodPolyethylene GlycolsYoung AdultDelayed-Action PreparationsFactor IXPolyethylene GlycolsComparative studyFactor IXHalf-lifeHemophilia BPharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID33624121
PMCPMC8275546
OpenAlexW3130635921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.