Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33623049›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

A synergetic effect of BARD1 mutations on tumorigenesis.

Wenjing Li, Xiaoyang Gu, Chunhong Liu, Yanyan Shi, Pan Wang, Na Zhang, Rui Wu, Liang Leng, Bingteng Xie, Chen Song and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. GermlineProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. BRCA1/BARD1 is a nucleosome reader and writer.Trends in biochemical sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wenjing Li *Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiaoyang Gu *Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chunhong LiuCenter for Quantitative Biology, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3666-2343
Yanyan ShiResearch Center of Clinical Epidemiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Pan WangCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Na ZhangCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Rui WuDepartment of Pathology, Peking University Third Hospital, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1192-5781
Liang LengKey Laboratory of Beijing for Identification and Safety Evaluation of Chinese Medicine, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Institute of Chinese Materia Medica, Beijing, China.
Bingteng XieCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chen SongCenter for Quantitative Biology, Academy for Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9730-3216
Mo LiCenter for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China. limo@hsc.pku.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-7005-7545
Peking University · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To date, a large number of mutations have been screened from breast and ovarian cancer patients. However, most of them are classified into benign or unidentified alterations due to their undetectable phenotypes. Whether and how they could cause tumors remains unknown, and this significantly limits diagnosis and therapy. Here, in a study of a family with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, we find that two BARD1 mutations, P24S and R378S, simultaneously exist in cis in surviving cancer patients. Neither of the single mutations causes a functional change, but together they synergetically impair the DNA damage response and lead to tumors in vitro and in vivo. Thus, our report not only demonstrates that BARD1 defects account for tumorigenesis but also uncovers the potential risk of synergetic effects between the large number of cis mutations in individual genes in the human genome.

Indexed as

CarcinogenesisHereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer SyndromeMutationTumor Suppressor ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein LigasesAdultAnimalsBRCA1 ProteinCell Line, TumorCell NucleusDNA DamageDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleGenomic InstabilityHumansMiceBARD1 protein, humanBRCA1 ProteinPeptidesTumor Suppressor ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein Ligases

Identifiers

PMID33623049
PMCPMC7902612
OpenAlexW3130274973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.