Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33623037›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Percolation of heterogeneous flows uncovers the bottlenecks of infrastructure networks.

Homayoun Hamedmoghadam, Mahdi Jalili, Hai L Vu, Lewi Stone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Invulnerability of the Urban Agglomeration Integrated Passenger Transport Network under Emergency Events.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Empirical evidence for a jamming transition in urban traffic.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Homayoun HamedmoghadamInstitute of Transport Studies, Faculty of Engineering, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. homayoun.hamed@monash.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3467-724X
Mahdi JaliliElectrical and Biomedical Engineering, School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0517-9420
Hai L VuInstitute of Transport Studies, Faculty of Engineering, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6984-2060
Lewi StoneMathematical Sciences, School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. lewistone100@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-6465-579X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whether it be the passengers' mobility demand in transportation systems, or the consumers' energy demand in power grids, the primary purpose of many infrastructure networks is to best serve this flow demand. In reality, the volume of flow demand fluctuates unevenly across complex networks while simultaneously being hindered by some form of congestion or overload. Nevertheless, there is little known about how the heterogeneity of flow demand influences the network flow dynamics under congestion. To explore this, we introduce a percolation-based network analysis framework underpinned by flow heterogeneity. Thereby, we theoretically identify bottleneck links with guaranteed decisive impact on how flows are passed through the network. The effectiveness of the framework is demonstrated on large-scale real transportation networks, where mitigating the congestion on a small fraction of the links identified as bottlenecks results in a significant network improvement.

Identifiers

PMID33623037
PMCPMC7902621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.